This week, our work in the House continued to move quickly as we advanced common-sense legislation to help Missouri’s economy and families. House Bill 73 seeks to reform the way Missouri pays out welfare benefits to children and families in need.
Sadly, around 60,000 children each month are receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (or TANF) welfare payments.1 While this program means well, these benefits are distributed to whoever is registered as the child’s parent, and far too often these “parents” spend money meant to feed their child on themselves.
One ugly example of how these welfare payments are spent is on drugs and alcohol. In bad cases parents are abusing taxpayer good will on a bad habit that is otherwise meant for hungry children, but in the worst instances pregnant “mothers” who receive the benefits are choosing a bad habit over their child.
In the data we have from 2010, there averaged around 85,000 individuals on TANF every month.2 None of these individuals were tested for illegal drugs as a condition of receiving their money. However, most people can’t get a job today without taking a drug test, yet those who would live off of the work of others are not made to take this same test – it is simply ridiculous.
In addition, numbers from (FY 2008) indicates that only 14.9% of Missouri families receiving TANF welfare payments are participating in some form of work.3 While there’s no way to know if drug-testing is part of this “work” – it probably isn’t. Even if all of these individuals are drug-tested as part of their work, it is still a very small minority that are tested.
Simply put, we can do better and we should do better. If we are going to decide to give assistance to needy children and families there must be some accountability to the taxpayers. Democrat members on the other side of the aisle criticized this proposal because they said it lacked compassion and was irresponsible. I feel like one of our greatest responsibilities is to taxpayers and not addressing this issue is abusing the compassion of all those Missourians whose hard earned dollars are helping these families get by.
It is time we took a stand and in the Missouri House of Representatives we have taken the first step. Please join me in supporting HB 73 as it moves to the Senate and hopefully lands on the Governor’s desk for approval.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve here in the House of Representatives. As always, I welcome your comments. You may reach me at 573-751-1488, send your e-mails to steven{dot}tilley{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov or write to me at the Missouri House of Representatives, State Capitol, Room 308, Jefferson City, MO 65101.
28 January 2011
Nolte: Legislation to Restore Co-Employee Liability Protection Receives Committee Approval
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – A House committee gave approval Thursday to legislation sponsored by state Rep. Jerry Nolte, R-Gladstone, that would protect Missouri workers and businesses by restoring liability protection taken away by the courts last summer. The House Workforce Development and Workplace Safety Committee approved HB 91 by a unanimous vote of 12-0.
House Bill 91 would restore co-employee liability protection in the Missouri’s Workers Compensation. The bill specifically addresses an issue raised last year when a court ruling allowed an injured worker to sue a co-worker after already settling a workers' compensation claim against his employer. Nolte’s legislation would reinstate liability protection to employees in cases where a workers compensation claim is settled. However, employees would still be liable in situations where injury is caused by the employee’s unprovoked violence or assault against another employee.
“The workers’ compensation reforms of 2005 and the court ruling made last year have had the unintended consequence of creating a negative environment for workers and employers in Missouri. The court ruling stripped away co-employee liability protection and opened up a floodgate of potential lawsuits by injured employees against co-workers,” said Nolte. “The end result is that it makes it more difficult for employers to hire and retain employees especially in supervisory roles when there is an increased chance the employee may be subjected to a lawsuit. Restoring co-employee liability protection will allow us to reverse these dangerous court decisions and get back to the original intent of the reforms made in 2005.”
HB 91 now awaits approval by the House Rules Committee before moving to the House floor for discussion.
House Bill 91 would restore co-employee liability protection in the Missouri’s Workers Compensation. The bill specifically addresses an issue raised last year when a court ruling allowed an injured worker to sue a co-worker after already settling a workers' compensation claim against his employer. Nolte’s legislation would reinstate liability protection to employees in cases where a workers compensation claim is settled. However, employees would still be liable in situations where injury is caused by the employee’s unprovoked violence or assault against another employee.
“The workers’ compensation reforms of 2005 and the court ruling made last year have had the unintended consequence of creating a negative environment for workers and employers in Missouri. The court ruling stripped away co-employee liability protection and opened up a floodgate of potential lawsuits by injured employees against co-workers,” said Nolte. “The end result is that it makes it more difficult for employers to hire and retain employees especially in supervisory roles when there is an increased chance the employee may be subjected to a lawsuit. Restoring co-employee liability protection will allow us to reverse these dangerous court decisions and get back to the original intent of the reforms made in 2005.”
HB 91 now awaits approval by the House Rules Committee before moving to the House floor for discussion.
Torpey: Significant Citizen Reaction To Prop B Revisions, Deputy Whip Appointment
Ed. Notes: Senate Bill 4 is incorrectly identified in this missive as Senate Bill 50. SB50 would allow electric companies to recover costs for developing new plants with consumer rate increases. Also, Stanley Cox is sponsor of HB131, not Chuck Gatschenberger.
This week, we have received many phone calls and emails in relation to legislation wanting to change or repeal Proposition B. Several members of the Missouri General Assembly have crafted legislation with varying language, from Senator Stouffer’s Senate Bill (50) which plans to repeal the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act in its entirety, to Representative Gatschenberger’s House Bill (131) which would simply modify some of the language of the Act. There is a lot of information on our House website, so I urge all of you to consider all sides of the issue. I look forward to receiving more letters, emails, and phone calls with your opinions. At the end of the day, the Missouri voters have spoken on this issue, and I believe that the General Assembly needs to remember that.
This week, members heard many bills for the first time. However, a bulk of our time in session was spent on House Bills 73 and 47, relating to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. On Wednesday, the House of Representatives heard the legislation once again, along with many amendments to edit the two bills. These two pieces of legislation, which after amendments, were finally read and passed, require certain recipients of TANF money to be tested for the illegal use of controlled substances. These bills not will not only help ensure that state TANF money is being used efficiently with recipients, but will also be another safeguard for children in homes where controlled substances are being used. In the end, I believe that all Missouri children deserve to grow up in a safe and comfortable home and House Bills 73 and 47 will aide that these children are taken care of.
House Speaker Steven Tilley announced the creation of two new special committees Tuesday. Tilley formed the committees to address the issues of services to the disabled and renewable energy. He appointed Representative Jeff Grisamore to serve as the chairman of the House Special Committee on Disability Services. Tilley appointed Rep. Jason Holsman chair the House Special Committee on Renewable Energy.
A bulk of my meetings this week were for my committee on Fiscal Review and my committee on Appropriations of Public Safety and Corrections. Fiscal Review committee read the fiscal note/review for the TANF bills and discussed the impact on the General Revenue fund. The Small Business committee met, as usual, to discuss current legislation affecting small businesses of Missouri. In Downsizing State Government, we heard House Bill 44, sponsored by Rep. Sara Lampe regarding the Paper Reduction Act and House Bill 139, sponsored by Rep. Jason Smith regarding the Missouri Accountability Portal.
Early this week, Representative Jason Smith, Majority Whip, graciously appointed me as a Deputy Whip. This new position will help me play a key role in helping our caucus achieve its legislative priorities for the 2011 legislative session. I am honored to have the opportunity to serve in this position; I will be able to better represent the interests of the 52nd District and I definitely look forward to working to help ensure the passage of legislation that will be of great benefit to the people in our area as well as the entire state of Missouri.
If you have any questions or concerns, call or email my office and we will get back to you as soon as possible. I hope you all enjoy the warmer weather we are blessed with this week!
A Special Note
This week, we have received many phone calls and emails in relation to legislation wanting to change or repeal Proposition B. Several members of the Missouri General Assembly have crafted legislation with varying language, from Senator Stouffer’s Senate Bill (50) which plans to repeal the Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act in its entirety, to Representative Gatschenberger’s House Bill (131) which would simply modify some of the language of the Act. There is a lot of information on our House website, so I urge all of you to consider all sides of the issue. I look forward to receiving more letters, emails, and phone calls with your opinions. At the end of the day, the Missouri voters have spoken on this issue, and I believe that the General Assembly needs to remember that.
2011 Legislative Session continues
This week, members heard many bills for the first time. However, a bulk of our time in session was spent on House Bills 73 and 47, relating to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. On Wednesday, the House of Representatives heard the legislation once again, along with many amendments to edit the two bills. These two pieces of legislation, which after amendments, were finally read and passed, require certain recipients of TANF money to be tested for the illegal use of controlled substances. These bills not will not only help ensure that state TANF money is being used efficiently with recipients, but will also be another safeguard for children in homes where controlled substances are being used. In the end, I believe that all Missouri children deserve to grow up in a safe and comfortable home and House Bills 73 and 47 will aide that these children are taken care of.
Committees
House Speaker Steven Tilley announced the creation of two new special committees Tuesday. Tilley formed the committees to address the issues of services to the disabled and renewable energy. He appointed Representative Jeff Grisamore to serve as the chairman of the House Special Committee on Disability Services. Tilley appointed Rep. Jason Holsman chair the House Special Committee on Renewable Energy.
A bulk of my meetings this week were for my committee on Fiscal Review and my committee on Appropriations of Public Safety and Corrections. Fiscal Review committee read the fiscal note/review for the TANF bills and discussed the impact on the General Revenue fund. The Small Business committee met, as usual, to discuss current legislation affecting small businesses of Missouri. In Downsizing State Government, we heard House Bill 44, sponsored by Rep. Sara Lampe regarding the Paper Reduction Act and House Bill 139, sponsored by Rep. Jason Smith regarding the Missouri Accountability Portal.
Leadership
Early this week, Representative Jason Smith, Majority Whip, graciously appointed me as a Deputy Whip. This new position will help me play a key role in helping our caucus achieve its legislative priorities for the 2011 legislative session. I am honored to have the opportunity to serve in this position; I will be able to better represent the interests of the 52nd District and I definitely look forward to working to help ensure the passage of legislation that will be of great benefit to the people in our area as well as the entire state of Missouri.
If you have any questions or concerns, call or email my office and we will get back to you as soon as possible. I hope you all enjoy the warmer weather we are blessed with this week!
27 January 2011
Schupp: TANF Amendments Ruled Out Of Order, Robo Calls From Ameren
Dear Friends and Neighbors,
In the State of the Union address this week, President Obama's message underscored the importance of creating and expanding jobs that will help our nation "win the future."
Policies that call for investment in the creativity and imagination of our people, supporting entrepreneurial efforts, are among those I will work toward in the House.
Job creation, education and development of clean energy technologies are issues that remain top priorities for our state during this session. I remain hopeful that we can move forward positively and develop solutions that serve us well into the future.
Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to serve.
Truly,
Jill
*Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
The House voted 121-37 in favor of authorizing drug testing of heads of household receiving federal dollars through a program called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
None of us wants to use taxpayer dollars to help support a drug habit. However, this bill is based on an assumption that has not proven to be true.
Contrary to what some believe, members of the TANF recipient population, often single parents with a couple of children, are no more likely to be drug abusers than members of the general population.
Families on TANF receive these benefits only temporarily, with a lifetime limit of five years. For a family of 3, benefits can range up to $292 per month (less than what I pay for monthly rent of an apartment in Jefferson City) to help them pay for rent, clothing, utilities and other basic needs.
Several amendments offered were ruled out of order on what could be considered technicalities; unfortunately, some of those would have improved the legislation.
The amendment I offered stipulated that only those who were not in compliance with the program designed to help them in their work search could be subjected to drug testing in order to continue receiving benefits. My goal was to encourage TANF recipients who are complying with the program to find employment and support themselves and their families.
Under the bill as passed, those testing positive for illegal drug use will lose their portion of benefits for 12 months, plunging the family further into poverty without helping them access solutions to unemployment or to a drug problem. While it will be recommended that they seek out treatment for drug abuse, on a typical day in Missouri, there 3700 unserved people waiting to get into drug rehab treatment.
This legislation will cost the State just under $2 million to implement in the first year alone. The number grows each additional year for the next several years. I would rather see this large amount of money go to test fewer people (see amendment) and help expand treatment options for those testing positive for drugs.
I voted "no" on this version of the bill, and am hopeful the Senate will either modify or defeat it.
A hearing on HB 47 and 73, the legislation mentioned above, was held in the General Laws committee before the legislation could go to the Floor for debate. Here I inquire of Rep. Ellen Brandom, the sponsor of the bill.
Thank you to "Mr. S" (I am keeping your identity secret!) who just called my office after receiving a "robo call" about nuclear power and Ameren's proposed site permitting process legislation.
You may receive a call like this, giving you a sentence or two about an issue and in some cases allowing you to press a button to be connected to my office. Please know that these "robo calls" are generated by special interest groups, not by my office. When you reach my office through a robo call, I haven't been given notice of who you are or the subject of your call. Please update me with your name, reason for calling, and a number at which I can reach you.
Most importantly, you never have to wait for a robo call to reach me! Your input, ideas and questions are always welcome. Call my office or the (314) phone number to share your thoughts.
In the State of the Union address this week, President Obama's message underscored the importance of creating and expanding jobs that will help our nation "win the future."
Policies that call for investment in the creativity and imagination of our people, supporting entrepreneurial efforts, are among those I will work toward in the House.
Job creation, education and development of clean energy technologies are issues that remain top priorities for our state during this session. I remain hopeful that we can move forward positively and develop solutions that serve us well into the future.
Thank you for allowing me this opportunity to serve.
Truly,
Jill
This Week in the House
HOUSE ENDORSES DRUG TESTING OF TANF* RECIPIENTS*Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
The House voted 121-37 in favor of authorizing drug testing of heads of household receiving federal dollars through a program called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
None of us wants to use taxpayer dollars to help support a drug habit. However, this bill is based on an assumption that has not proven to be true.
Contrary to what some believe, members of the TANF recipient population, often single parents with a couple of children, are no more likely to be drug abusers than members of the general population.
Families on TANF receive these benefits only temporarily, with a lifetime limit of five years. For a family of 3, benefits can range up to $292 per month (less than what I pay for monthly rent of an apartment in Jefferson City) to help them pay for rent, clothing, utilities and other basic needs.
Several amendments offered were ruled out of order on what could be considered technicalities; unfortunately, some of those would have improved the legislation.
The amendment I offered stipulated that only those who were not in compliance with the program designed to help them in their work search could be subjected to drug testing in order to continue receiving benefits. My goal was to encourage TANF recipients who are complying with the program to find employment and support themselves and their families.
Under the bill as passed, those testing positive for illegal drug use will lose their portion of benefits for 12 months, plunging the family further into poverty without helping them access solutions to unemployment or to a drug problem. While it will be recommended that they seek out treatment for drug abuse, on a typical day in Missouri, there 3700 unserved people waiting to get into drug rehab treatment.
This legislation will cost the State just under $2 million to implement in the first year alone. The number grows each additional year for the next several years. I would rather see this large amount of money go to test fewer people (see amendment) and help expand treatment options for those testing positive for drugs.
I voted "no" on this version of the bill, and am hopeful the Senate will either modify or defeat it.
A Look Inside the House
A hearing on HB 47 and 73, the legislation mentioned above, was held in the General Laws committee before the legislation could go to the Floor for debate. Here I inquire of Rep. Ellen Brandom, the sponsor of the bill.
Good News/Bad News... Which do you want first?
From Marc Powers, Democratic Caucus Communications DirectorCOMMUNITY COLLEGES AGREE TO LIMIT TUITION INCREASES
Missouri's community colleges have agreed to limit tuition increases to $5 per credit hour for the 2011-2012 school year. The Jan. 25 announcement came nearly week after Gov. Jay Nixon proposed cutting state appropriations for public colleges and universities by 7 percent for the upcoming school year, which is less than higher education officialsMISSOURI HAD NATION'S THIRD-WORST 2010 JOB L0SS RATE
Employment in Missouri declined by 0.6 percent during 2010 for the third-worst job-loss percentage in the nation, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The only states to fare worse last year were Nevada, where employment dipped by 1.5 percent, and New Jersey, which suffered a 0.8 percent decline. Missouri's unemployment rate in December stood at 9.5 percent.Robo Calls
Thank you to "Mr. S" (I am keeping your identity secret!) who just called my office after receiving a "robo call" about nuclear power and Ameren's proposed site permitting process legislation.
You may receive a call like this, giving you a sentence or two about an issue and in some cases allowing you to press a button to be connected to my office. Please know that these "robo calls" are generated by special interest groups, not by my office. When you reach my office through a robo call, I haven't been given notice of who you are or the subject of your call. Please update me with your name, reason for calling, and a number at which I can reach you.
Most importantly, you never have to wait for a robo call to reach me! Your input, ideas and questions are always welcome. Call my office or the (314) phone number to share your thoughts.
Stouffer: Keeping School Funding Stable
In another tight budget year, the Missouri General Assembly plans to provide predictable and stable funding for Missouri’s classrooms.
Funding local schools is a critical part of our state budget. This decade, Missouri’s schools have received at least as much or more in funding every year, despite economic challenges.
Currently, schools are funded on a per-pupil basis. High-performing districts are identified and consideration is given to the local costs to educate students. This becomes the standard statewide. Put simply, the state helps local districts meet the per-pupil spending benchmark established by high-performing schools.
In addition, when the latest school funding formula was crafted, schools were promised that they would not receive less funding from the state. These are known as “hold harmless” districts. For rural Missouri, another key component of funding is the small schools grant program. This provides districts with fewer than 350 students a grant of $500 per pupil.
To give some real-world perspective, I have provided information on school enrollment, spending and performance in the last five years for schools in our area. Please note, the data only compares two years (five years apart) and does not translate into trends.
In the 21st Senatorial District, of the 44 school districts, only seven have increased enrollment. Six of these school districts are serviced by four-lane highways: Macon County R-1 – Macon (+9.01 percent), Sweet Springs (+6.70 percent), Callao (+5.45 percent), Atlanta (+5.45 percent), Kearney (+3.79 percent), and Boonville (+2.13 percent). Obviously, the four-lane highway has played a role in the increased enrollment in these districts. This may be another argument for improved transportation infrastructure in rural areas.
School districts that have seen a drastic drop in enrollment are Miami (-47.18 percent), Cooper Co. R-IV – Bunceton (-31.76 percent), Stet (-27.10 percent), Malta Bend (-24.20 percent), Macon Co. – New Cambria (-22.72 percent), Bosworth (-22.61 percent), and Keytesville (-22.01 percent).
Even though an overwhelming amount of schools in our area have decreased enrollment, every single district has increased per-pupil spending. This is most evident in the same schools that have decreased enrollment: Miami (+54.92 percent), Stet (+52.53 percent), Norborne (+49.37 percent), Keytesville (+49.11 percent), La Plata (+45.63 percent), Macon Co. R-IV – New Cambria (+45.41 percent), and Cooper Co. R-IV – Bunceton (+44.96 percent).
If average ACT scores are an indicator of performance, there seems to be little to no correlation with funding. Several districts of varying sizes, located in different counties and reporting different spending levels, placed above the state average for the ACT.
The information I provided in this column simply compares two different years and, considering the small class sizes in many rural districts, may not clearly show trends. However, this five-year sample shows the increase in funding per student throughout the state. All of us should expect this type of stable, predictable funding in the future.
For more information or a copy of the table referenced above, visit www.senate.mo.gov/stouffer.
Funding local schools is a critical part of our state budget. This decade, Missouri’s schools have received at least as much or more in funding every year, despite economic challenges.
Currently, schools are funded on a per-pupil basis. High-performing districts are identified and consideration is given to the local costs to educate students. This becomes the standard statewide. Put simply, the state helps local districts meet the per-pupil spending benchmark established by high-performing schools.
In addition, when the latest school funding formula was crafted, schools were promised that they would not receive less funding from the state. These are known as “hold harmless” districts. For rural Missouri, another key component of funding is the small schools grant program. This provides districts with fewer than 350 students a grant of $500 per pupil.
To give some real-world perspective, I have provided information on school enrollment, spending and performance in the last five years for schools in our area. Please note, the data only compares two years (five years apart) and does not translate into trends.
In the 21st Senatorial District, of the 44 school districts, only seven have increased enrollment. Six of these school districts are serviced by four-lane highways: Macon County R-1 – Macon (+9.01 percent), Sweet Springs (+6.70 percent), Callao (+5.45 percent), Atlanta (+5.45 percent), Kearney (+3.79 percent), and Boonville (+2.13 percent). Obviously, the four-lane highway has played a role in the increased enrollment in these districts. This may be another argument for improved transportation infrastructure in rural areas.
School districts that have seen a drastic drop in enrollment are Miami (-47.18 percent), Cooper Co. R-IV – Bunceton (-31.76 percent), Stet (-27.10 percent), Malta Bend (-24.20 percent), Macon Co. – New Cambria (-22.72 percent), Bosworth (-22.61 percent), and Keytesville (-22.01 percent).
Even though an overwhelming amount of schools in our area have decreased enrollment, every single district has increased per-pupil spending. This is most evident in the same schools that have decreased enrollment: Miami (+54.92 percent), Stet (+52.53 percent), Norborne (+49.37 percent), Keytesville (+49.11 percent), La Plata (+45.63 percent), Macon Co. R-IV – New Cambria (+45.41 percent), and Cooper Co. R-IV – Bunceton (+44.96 percent).
If average ACT scores are an indicator of performance, there seems to be little to no correlation with funding. Several districts of varying sizes, located in different counties and reporting different spending levels, placed above the state average for the ACT.
The information I provided in this column simply compares two different years and, considering the small class sizes in many rural districts, may not clearly show trends. However, this five-year sample shows the increase in funding per student throughout the state. All of us should expect this type of stable, predictable funding in the future.
For more information or a copy of the table referenced above, visit www.senate.mo.gov/stouffer.
Schaefer: Bills Filed Concerning Gifted Education, Reimbursement For Physical Therapists
This week was a busy one at the Capitol. Bills are being heard in their assigned committees, the Appropriations Committee is looking into Gov. Nixon’s budget recommendations, and legislators from across the state are growing accustomed to the daily hustle and bustle of the Capitol.
On Monday night (1/24), I was privileged to receive the University of Missouri’s Geyer Award. The award recognizes the work of public officials and citizens for their positive impact on higher education at Mizzou. Award recipients from previous years include Govs. Roger Wilson, Mel Carnahan and Christopher “Kit” Bond. It was truly an honor to be one of the recipients of this award.
I introduced two bills last Thursday (1/20) in the Missouri Senate. Senate Bill 147 would require school districts to include in their annual school accountability report card whether the school district currently has a state-approved gifted education program and the percentage and number of students being served by the program.
I also introduced Senate Bill 148, which would require that physical therapists receive the same reimbursements for procedures similar to those any other health care provider would offer.
Another one of my sponsored bills, Senate Bill 119, which would create the Private Landowner Protection Act and allow for the creation of conservation easements, was referred to the Agriculture, Food Protection, and Outdoor Resources Committee last Thursday.
Also on Monday (1/24), I had the pleasure of meeting with Gary Heimericks, a long-time employee of the Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Heimericks was recently honored by the Senate with a resolution for his work of over 30 years with the state of Missouri.
I also had the chance to meet with the Missouri Association of Realtors on their Legislative Day at the Capitol on Wednesday of last week (1/19). At our meeting, they presented me with a certificate of appreciation for my legislative service.
I sponsored one gubernatorial appointment this week. Russ Unger from Columbia was appointed to the Missouri Community Service Commission. Russ was accompanied at the hearing by his wife and family.
Thank you for your continued interest in the issues that affect the citizens of Boone and Randolph counties. If you have any questions or concerns please contact my office.
On Monday night (1/24), I was privileged to receive the University of Missouri’s Geyer Award. The award recognizes the work of public officials and citizens for their positive impact on higher education at Mizzou. Award recipients from previous years include Govs. Roger Wilson, Mel Carnahan and Christopher “Kit” Bond. It was truly an honor to be one of the recipients of this award.
I introduced two bills last Thursday (1/20) in the Missouri Senate. Senate Bill 147 would require school districts to include in their annual school accountability report card whether the school district currently has a state-approved gifted education program and the percentage and number of students being served by the program.
I also introduced Senate Bill 148, which would require that physical therapists receive the same reimbursements for procedures similar to those any other health care provider would offer.
Another one of my sponsored bills, Senate Bill 119, which would create the Private Landowner Protection Act and allow for the creation of conservation easements, was referred to the Agriculture, Food Protection, and Outdoor Resources Committee last Thursday.
Also on Monday (1/24), I had the pleasure of meeting with Gary Heimericks, a long-time employee of the Department of Natural Resources. Mr. Heimericks was recently honored by the Senate with a resolution for his work of over 30 years with the state of Missouri.
I also had the chance to meet with the Missouri Association of Realtors on their Legislative Day at the Capitol on Wednesday of last week (1/19). At our meeting, they presented me with a certificate of appreciation for my legislative service.
I sponsored one gubernatorial appointment this week. Russ Unger from Columbia was appointed to the Missouri Community Service Commission. Russ was accompanied at the hearing by his wife and family.
Thank you for your continued interest in the issues that affect the citizens of Boone and Randolph counties. If you have any questions or concerns please contact my office.
| Click on the photos below for a larger version: | ||
 |  |  |
| Gary Heimericks and Senator Schaefer shake hands on the senate floor. | Senator Schaefer and the Missouri Association of Realtors pose on the Capitol's grand staircase. | Senator Schaefer with Russ Unger and his family during his Senate Gubernatorial appointment hearing. |
Kelley: Two Bills Discussed Before Crowded Committees
This week the Missouri House of Representatives heard several controversial bills in committees. I have been pleased with our leadership team’s willingness to move forward with legislation which will spark some intense discussion.
One is a bill [HB73] to drug test certain welfare recipients. Personally, I have a difficult time understanding why anyone would be opposed to such a concept. In the real world, employees are often required to submit to background checks, including drug testing, as a condition of employment. Why should anyone receiving taxpayers’ dollars be given favored status over a gainfully employed citizen?
The hearing was crowded to the point of overflowing. Most were there to testify against the requirement. Issues such as privacy and costs were raised during the discussion. I would submit if a person is living off the generosity of taxpayers, certain behaviors should be avoided, especially if those behaviors happen to be illegal. As to the cost, any upfront expense of the drug testing itself would be more than offset by reductions in payments as well as limiting costs to society by deterring illegal behavior. Following a committee vote, the entire House will further debate the issue.
Also considered this week by a House committee was a bill [HB131] to make changes to some of the provisions of Proposition B. We are attempting to find a way to honor the integrity of a statewide vote while still keeping our legitimate dog breeders from having to go out of business as a result of the new law. There have been several similar bills filed in both the House and Senate to accomplish this. At the hearing, many people showed up to testify on both sides of the issue. We heard many heart wrenching stories about abused animals, but this only justified what we are attempting to accomplish. Most of the bad operators are not licensed and would be unaffected by Proposition B. The most harm would be done to breeders who have been following the law and abiding by current regulations.
I expect the committee will look favorably on sending a bill of some kind to the full House for debate. Since several bills have been introduced, there is a good chance the final version will include ideas from each. We must act quickly on this issue to save an important segment of our agriculture industry.
One is a bill [HB73] to drug test certain welfare recipients. Personally, I have a difficult time understanding why anyone would be opposed to such a concept. In the real world, employees are often required to submit to background checks, including drug testing, as a condition of employment. Why should anyone receiving taxpayers’ dollars be given favored status over a gainfully employed citizen?
The hearing was crowded to the point of overflowing. Most were there to testify against the requirement. Issues such as privacy and costs were raised during the discussion. I would submit if a person is living off the generosity of taxpayers, certain behaviors should be avoided, especially if those behaviors happen to be illegal. As to the cost, any upfront expense of the drug testing itself would be more than offset by reductions in payments as well as limiting costs to society by deterring illegal behavior. Following a committee vote, the entire House will further debate the issue.
Also considered this week by a House committee was a bill [HB131] to make changes to some of the provisions of Proposition B. We are attempting to find a way to honor the integrity of a statewide vote while still keeping our legitimate dog breeders from having to go out of business as a result of the new law. There have been several similar bills filed in both the House and Senate to accomplish this. At the hearing, many people showed up to testify on both sides of the issue. We heard many heart wrenching stories about abused animals, but this only justified what we are attempting to accomplish. Most of the bad operators are not licensed and would be unaffected by Proposition B. The most harm would be done to breeders who have been following the law and abiding by current regulations.
I expect the committee will look favorably on sending a bill of some kind to the full House for debate. Since several bills have been introduced, there is a good chance the final version will include ideas from each. We must act quickly on this issue to save an important segment of our agriculture industry.
Hoskins: Bill Would Grant Grace Period For Returning Military Personnel To Renew Drivers License
The Capitol continues to be busy. I’m delighted to report several things as we continue to make progress in advancing legislation headed to the Senate.
I presented HB 204 to my fellow members of the House Veterans Committee this week. HB 204 would allow any person discharged from the military to renew a driver’s license without examination six months from the date of discharge or within 90 days of reestablishing residency in Missouri. The bill also expands that privilege to the spouse or a dependent, age 21 or older.
Last fall I received a call from a constituent who had returned from active duty in Afghanistan with an expired driver’s license. He wants to remain a Missouri resident even while his duty station has temporarily changed to Fort Riley, Kansas. As it is now, active duty personnel can renew a driver’s license by mail but that may not be terribly convenient. In addition to the members of the military stationed outside Missouri, their spouses and families can also be impacted. Serving in the military affects the entire family. I believe we need to do what we can to simplify life, even in this small way, to recognize the sacrifices our military families make for us.
HB 204 was unanimously approved by the House Veterans Committee by a vote of 13-0 and received consent status. The next step will be for the bill to go to the full House for consideration.
My duties have expanded a bit. Speaker of the House Steve Tilley has appointed me to serve on the Special Standing Committee on Renewable Energy. Show Me Energy at Centerview has provided me with a good education on how to convert switchgrass and other renewable sources into energy. I also learned about wind turbines and solar energy from Ronald Barrett from Holden. He and his wife have established a new business, Emerald Wind Energy International, at Holden. Why look to oil and coal for our energy supplies when there are available alternatives right here? This committee will look to incorporating renewable alternatives into all phases of our lives.
To share some scholarship news, I learned of an opportunity for students to win one of four $1000 college scholarships during FAFSA Frenzy at special events in February and March. FAFSA stands for Free Application for Federal Student Aid. FAFSA is the first step all students must take to obtain financial assistance to attend college. State and federal governments and all colleges and universities consider the FAFSA when awarding need-based student financial aid. FAFSA Frenzy events help students and their parents complete the form and submit accurate financial information to determine student eligibility for need-based student aid.
Besides access to professional assistance in completing the FAFSA, there will also be information regarding federal student aid programs and Missouri state aid programs at these Frenzy events. Check the web site at www.dhe.mo.gov for more information or to find a location near you.
I welcome Leslee Moon, a student at the University of Missouri, as an intern for the semester in my office. Leslee is a senior majoring in Parks, Recreation and Tourism. Originally from Oregon, Leslee served in the US Army as an MP. Currently a member of the Reserves, she is a career counselor. Her last active duty assignment was at Fort Leonard Wood, which is how she found her way to MU. While in my office, Leslee will be helping with committee work and hosting groups visiting the Capitol.
Please share this report with anyone you feel would be interested in this information. It is genuinely a privilege to serve as your state representative. In the meantime, keep warm and be safe during this true January weather.
Legislation
I presented HB 204 to my fellow members of the House Veterans Committee this week. HB 204 would allow any person discharged from the military to renew a driver’s license without examination six months from the date of discharge or within 90 days of reestablishing residency in Missouri. The bill also expands that privilege to the spouse or a dependent, age 21 or older.
Last fall I received a call from a constituent who had returned from active duty in Afghanistan with an expired driver’s license. He wants to remain a Missouri resident even while his duty station has temporarily changed to Fort Riley, Kansas. As it is now, active duty personnel can renew a driver’s license by mail but that may not be terribly convenient. In addition to the members of the military stationed outside Missouri, their spouses and families can also be impacted. Serving in the military affects the entire family. I believe we need to do what we can to simplify life, even in this small way, to recognize the sacrifices our military families make for us.
HB 204 was unanimously approved by the House Veterans Committee by a vote of 13-0 and received consent status. The next step will be for the bill to go to the full House for consideration.
My duties have expanded a bit. Speaker of the House Steve Tilley has appointed me to serve on the Special Standing Committee on Renewable Energy. Show Me Energy at Centerview has provided me with a good education on how to convert switchgrass and other renewable sources into energy. I also learned about wind turbines and solar energy from Ronald Barrett from Holden. He and his wife have established a new business, Emerald Wind Energy International, at Holden. Why look to oil and coal for our energy supplies when there are available alternatives right here? This committee will look to incorporating renewable alternatives into all phases of our lives.
In Other News
To share some scholarship news, I learned of an opportunity for students to win one of four $1000 college scholarships during FAFSA Frenzy at special events in February and March. FAFSA stands for Free Application for Federal Student Aid. FAFSA is the first step all students must take to obtain financial assistance to attend college. State and federal governments and all colleges and universities consider the FAFSA when awarding need-based student financial aid. FAFSA Frenzy events help students and their parents complete the form and submit accurate financial information to determine student eligibility for need-based student aid.
Besides access to professional assistance in completing the FAFSA, there will also be information regarding federal student aid programs and Missouri state aid programs at these Frenzy events. Check the web site at www.dhe.mo.gov for more information or to find a location near you.
I welcome Leslee Moon, a student at the University of Missouri, as an intern for the semester in my office. Leslee is a senior majoring in Parks, Recreation and Tourism. Originally from Oregon, Leslee served in the US Army as an MP. Currently a member of the Reserves, she is a career counselor. Her last active duty assignment was at Fort Leonard Wood, which is how she found her way to MU. While in my office, Leslee will be helping with committee work and hosting groups visiting the Capitol.
Please share this report with anyone you feel would be interested in this information. It is genuinely a privilege to serve as your state representative. In the meantime, keep warm and be safe during this true January weather.
Nance: In Committees, Accounting For Excessive Revenue From Traffic Fines
“Nothing is more destructive of respect for the government and the law of the land than passing laws which cannot be enforced.” –Albert Einstein
I attended my first meeting of the Agriculture Committee on Tuesday. The room seats about 80 people and we had at least 140 to hear bills [HB131] to amend Proposition B (Puppy Mills). After two hours of testimony the hearing ended, but we are having a committee meeting today.
I presented HB 105 in Crime Prevention and Public Safety on Wednesday.
This bill requires the governing body of a city, town, or village to prepare and send to the department an annual report of the fines and court costs collected and the entity’s general revenue for the year.
If fines and court costs exceed the 35% limit, the entity must include with the report the payment of any excess revenues. The department director is required to disburse the excess to the schools of that county within 30 days of the receipt of the payment.
Failure to send the annual report or excess revenue to the department director will result in the city, town, or village being subject to a civil penalty of up to $1,000.
I offered the italicized words in a bill that passed two years ago because certain cities were collecting up to 45% of their general revenue on highways (“Speed Traps”).
In September of 2010, a Missouri state auditor found that the City of Randolph had violated state law by collecting more than 35% of its revenue from traffic tickets. They collected around $150,000 in 2009 from highway tickets and were only allowed by law to keep about $95,000. As of today they have not forwarded those excess funds to the state for distribution to our Clay County schools. This bill would put some teeth in the law.
On Wednesday HB 73 & 47 were debated.
They require the Department of Social Services to develop a program to screen and test each work-eligible applicant or work-eligible recipient for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program benefits that the department has reasonable cause to believe, based on the screening, engages in the illegal use of controlled substances. An applicant or recipient who tested positive for the illegal use of a controlled substance which has not been prescribed by a licensed health care provider must, after an administrative hearing by the department, be declared ineligible for TANF benefits for one year from the date of the administrative hearing decision and must be referred to an appropriate substance abuse treatment program approved by the Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse within the Department of Mental Health.
Any member of a household which includes a person, who has been declared ineligible for TANF benefits, if otherwise eligible, will continue to receive benefits as protective or vendor payments to a third-party payee.
Supporters say that the bill will prevent people who are receiving government assistance through the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Program from using these moneys to buy drugs instead of groceries without cutting the benefits going to the children.
Most employers require an applicant to undergo a drug test before he or she is hired, and this program will help people seeking employment. They also said that children of those addicted to drugs are being neglected; therefore, the current system needs to be changed.
Those who oppose the bills say that the real problem is providing proper drug treatment to these individuals. The bill will not address this problem sufficiently because there are not adequate resources available for treatment, especially for this newly identified group of people. The bill passed out of the House with a vote of 121-37.
Visiting this past week with the realtors were Marcha Tietjen, Yvonne Parker, Mike Ebenroth and Rue and Cecil Lovett.
Superintendent Jim Horton and I attended a presentation on the school formula at the Missouri Association of Schools Administrators.
I met Dr. Blaine Henningsen, the 1971 quarterback of the State Champion Richmond Spartans. Blaine is the Superintendent of Carthage schools.
In Committees
I attended my first meeting of the Agriculture Committee on Tuesday. The room seats about 80 people and we had at least 140 to hear bills [HB131] to amend Proposition B (Puppy Mills). After two hours of testimony the hearing ended, but we are having a committee meeting today.
I presented HB 105 in Crime Prevention and Public Safety on Wednesday.
HB 105
Currently, if a city, town, or village receives more than 35% of its total annual revenue from fines and court costs for traffic violations, all revenue from these violations in excess of 35% must be sent to the Director of the Department of Revenue.This bill requires the governing body of a city, town, or village to prepare and send to the department an annual report of the fines and court costs collected and the entity’s general revenue for the year.
If fines and court costs exceed the 35% limit, the entity must include with the report the payment of any excess revenues. The department director is required to disburse the excess to the schools of that county within 30 days of the receipt of the payment.
Failure to send the annual report or excess revenue to the department director will result in the city, town, or village being subject to a civil penalty of up to $1,000.
I offered the italicized words in a bill that passed two years ago because certain cities were collecting up to 45% of their general revenue on highways (“Speed Traps”).
In September of 2010, a Missouri state auditor found that the City of Randolph had violated state law by collecting more than 35% of its revenue from traffic tickets. They collected around $150,000 in 2009 from highway tickets and were only allowed by law to keep about $95,000. As of today they have not forwarded those excess funds to the state for distribution to our Clay County schools. This bill would put some teeth in the law.
On the House Floor
On Wednesday HB 73 & 47 were debated.
They require the Department of Social Services to develop a program to screen and test each work-eligible applicant or work-eligible recipient for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program benefits that the department has reasonable cause to believe, based on the screening, engages in the illegal use of controlled substances. An applicant or recipient who tested positive for the illegal use of a controlled substance which has not been prescribed by a licensed health care provider must, after an administrative hearing by the department, be declared ineligible for TANF benefits for one year from the date of the administrative hearing decision and must be referred to an appropriate substance abuse treatment program approved by the Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse within the Department of Mental Health.
Any member of a household which includes a person, who has been declared ineligible for TANF benefits, if otherwise eligible, will continue to receive benefits as protective or vendor payments to a third-party payee.
Supporters say that the bill will prevent people who are receiving government assistance through the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) Program from using these moneys to buy drugs instead of groceries without cutting the benefits going to the children.
Most employers require an applicant to undergo a drug test before he or she is hired, and this program will help people seeking employment. They also said that children of those addicted to drugs are being neglected; therefore, the current system needs to be changed.
Those who oppose the bills say that the real problem is providing proper drug treatment to these individuals. The bill will not address this problem sufficiently because there are not adequate resources available for treatment, especially for this newly identified group of people. The bill passed out of the House with a vote of 121-37.
Visitors
Visiting this past week with the realtors were Marcha Tietjen, Yvonne Parker, Mike Ebenroth and Rue and Cecil Lovett.
Superintendent Jim Horton and I attended a presentation on the school formula at the Missouri Association of Schools Administrators.
I met Dr. Blaine Henningsen, the 1971 quarterback of the State Champion Richmond Spartans. Blaine is the Superintendent of Carthage schools.
Tim Jones: Addressing the Addresses, Parent Power and Choice Act, Floor Action
At right: 
Rep. Jones with Speaker Tilley and constituent, Tom Voss, at the RCGA Legislative Briefing.
Winter relented and cast forth a glimmer of Spring this week as we finally enjoyed a quiet return journey to the State Capitol, free from the frosty elements of snow or ice. Beneath the Capitol Dome, hundreds of citizens gathered from the four corners of the State to attend various hearings on many issues with the coming challenges of the Budget looming over all discussions. On the House Floor, we had our first spirited debate where the philosophical differences were presented as we debated and gave overwhelming first round passage to require drug testing of adult welfare recipients…
Until our next update, I am, and remain, in your service.
Rep. Jones with Speaker Tilley and constituent, Tom Voss, at the RCGA Legislative Briefing.Winter relented and cast forth a glimmer of Spring this week as we finally enjoyed a quiet return journey to the State Capitol, free from the frosty elements of snow or ice. Beneath the Capitol Dome, hundreds of citizens gathered from the four corners of the State to attend various hearings on many issues with the coming challenges of the Budget looming over all discussions. On the House Floor, we had our first spirited debate where the philosophical differences were presented as we debated and gave overwhelming first round passage to require drug testing of adult welfare recipients…
Addressing the Address
Last week Gov. Nixon delivered the State of the State Address. Contrary to the Governor’s statements, his proposed total budget reductions throughout state programs amount to around $300M, not $700M. He has proposed 863 job cuts, yet, none involve his personal staff. This is not good leadership given that the Senate and House have already cut internal staff and salaries. Climbing out of this hole will require us all to sacrifice, not using the Governor’s plan to require only others to sacrifice. Part of the Governor’s budget calls for $67.4M in Medicaid reductions. However, more than half are provider rate cuts. Just because the Medicaid formula says, “Here is what you get paid for your service,” does not mean the cost for providing the service is suddenly what Medicaid stated. The cost is still the same and the inability to collect the proper payment for their services causes doctors and hospitals to inflate the costs elsewhere to make up the difference or refuse to offer services at all. This amounts to higher costs for everyone and the result is income redistribution. Missourians are demanding fundamental changes with real solutions, grounded in the values of freedom, liberty, responsibility, and charity, not cradle to grave, income redistribution. The Governor also proposed that funding for K-12 schools remain static, yet when you review the actual numbers, the $112M currently available to the 522 struggling school districts must be held over until the next fiscal year for the numbers to match. This, on top of the $62M in school transportation funds being withheld by the Governor, spells trouble for maintaining the current funding rates.Parent Power and Choice Act
Next week, I will file the “Parent Power and Choice Act” that provides options for parents whose children are required to attend a school that is failing to meet their child’s educational needs. If parents believe their children are being underserved, and over fifty percent of those parents sign a petition requesting the local education agency to make education alternatives available, a triggering event occurs that requires the local agency to make those options available. Once the trigger is initiated, parents will have three options for providing the best educational scenario for their children. The first option is a restart model in which the local educational agency converts or reopens the existing school under a charter school operator, a charter management organization, or an education management organization that has been selected through a review process. The second option is to close the school and move the students to another school within the local educational agency. Option Three would allow a local educational agency to implement a school voucher program. The voucher would cover the cost of attendance necessary for the student to attend any private or public school for which the student is eligible to be enrolled. This is a dramatic proposal that places parents in control of the free public education that we claim our State offers. It is time that all proposals be on the table to rectify our failing schools across the State.Tuesday, January 25, 2011
On Tuesday evening, many of us in Jefferson City and across Missouri turned our attentions toward the larger state of our nation and listened to the State of the Union address. I found it interesting that every time the President discussed spending (which often requires increasing your taxes), he used to word “investing”. The people spoke last November and apparently the President and the leaders of the US Senate did not hear the message. It is time to reign in the spending and make the necessary cuts to begin paying down our massive national debt. Merely “freezing” spending at current levels for the next 5 years is bad news for America, and bad news for Missourians. What it means is continued deficit spending and increased debt.FLOOR ACTION: Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Spirited debate erupted on the House Floor as we debated HB 73. As you know by now, HB 73 allows for the drug testing of welfare (TANF) recipients suspected of using a controlled substance. Despite attempts from some House Democrats to continue subsidizing the illegal drug use of some TANF benefit recipients, HB 73 overwhelmingly received first round passage, was ordered printed and perfected, and was placed on the House calendar for third reading. It is unconscionable to think the right decision is to continue to provide taxpayer funding for anyone’s drug use.FLOOR ACTION: Thursday, January 27, 2011
Today, I brought to the Floor the House Resolution [HR274] that governs the Rules of Procedure for the House Ethics Committee of which I am the Chairman. I am pleased to report that the Ethics Committee Rules received unanimous support both in Committee and on the House Floor. Every single Democrat and Republican who voted today supported this very important procedural resolution.Public Service Announcement
The Family Enrichment and Resource Program (FERP), a local nonprofit organization which I very much support, is hosting a Children’s Art Auction at the Wyman Center on Saturday, February 5th from 6:30pm-9:00pm. The cocktail reception is $12 per person which includes admission, beverages, hors d’oeuvres and childcare, if needed. The purpose of this inaugural program is to bring families together and provide resources and activities that will guide parents in their child rearing and child development skills. For additional information or to RSVP, please call Pam at 314-603-5787 or email your reply to stregthenfamilies{at}yahoo{dot}com.Visiting the Capitol
If you ever find yourself in or around Jefferson City at any time during the year, please feel free to visit us! Stop by our new office location in Room 302 and we will be happy to meet and greet you!Personal News & Notes
I am finding that my duties as Floor Leader truly run the gamut. I am sought out by members, of both sides of the aisle, for my advice and counsel on a number of issues, from legislation to human resources to office administration. I am very humbled by the fact that I can be of service to not only my own constituents, but to constituents and their Representatives all across the State. And because this makes for very long days and sometimes longer nights, I continue to owe a debt of gratitude and thanks to my excellent staff, my colleagues at my law firm, DosterUllom, LLC, and especially to Suzanne, Katie and Abby, who are a sight for sore eyes every Thursday evening when I return home! If we can ever be of any assistance, do not hesitate to contact us at: 573.751.0562 or you can reach my primary assistant, Jody at: jody{dot}williams{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov.Until our next update, I am, and remain, in your service.
Engler: Fighting Fraud with Voter I.D.
In the Financial and Governmental Organizations and Elections Committee this week, we worked on voter ID legislation that would require anyone voting in the state to show photo identification. This is not the first time the legislation has come up—we passed a similar law in 2006, but a court ruled the measure unconstitutional. However, in a court case in 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled an Indiana law was "amply justified by the valid interest and protecting the integrity and reliability of the election process." Because of this ruling, our efforts to fight voter fraud and institute an identification requirement are renewed.
My legislation addressing voter ID is Senate Joint Resolution 9, a constitutional amendment that would require voters to show valid, government-issued photo identification. The legislation, if approved by voters, would make sure that each ballot cast in this state is an honest one.
Complimenting legislation has been introduced that would ensure that no one who has the legal right to vote is excluded. Exceptions for citizens born before 1941 and for those unable to obtain a photo ID because of a physical or mental disability are included. There are also provisions for those who cannot afford the cost of identification.
We tackled several other big topics in Senate committees this week as well. One is a bill [SB23] that would put the St. Louis Police Department under local control. Since the Civil War, a state-appointed board has controlled the department. This is not the first time a bill has been proposed to change management of the St. Louis Police Department, and as we debate the details of the legislation, I believe there’s more to the story than meets the eye. In committee, those testifying against the bill (including the St. Louis Police Officers Association) brought up concerns over residency requirements, pensions and the corruption in the city. These issues need to be addressed to make sure the control of the police department is in the best hands possible.
A crowd also gathered to testify on changes to the puppy mill act, which was passed by the voters by a narrow margin this past November. There are concerns that the law, as it is currently written, puts unnecessary limits on business owners, and so legislation has been filed to make sure we’re not turning honest breeders into criminals while still protecting the safety of animals in Missouri. (Winston was asked to be an expert witness, but the meeting was during naptime, so he did not testify.)
Click on the photo below to view a larger image.
My intern this year from Missouri State University, Keaton Ashlock, is an impressive photographer, and I wanted to feature some of his shots of the Capitol in my weekly column. Keaton took this one right after a big snow in Jefferson City.
My legislation addressing voter ID is Senate Joint Resolution 9, a constitutional amendment that would require voters to show valid, government-issued photo identification. The legislation, if approved by voters, would make sure that each ballot cast in this state is an honest one.
Complimenting legislation has been introduced that would ensure that no one who has the legal right to vote is excluded. Exceptions for citizens born before 1941 and for those unable to obtain a photo ID because of a physical or mental disability are included. There are also provisions for those who cannot afford the cost of identification.
We tackled several other big topics in Senate committees this week as well. One is a bill [SB23] that would put the St. Louis Police Department under local control. Since the Civil War, a state-appointed board has controlled the department. This is not the first time a bill has been proposed to change management of the St. Louis Police Department, and as we debate the details of the legislation, I believe there’s more to the story than meets the eye. In committee, those testifying against the bill (including the St. Louis Police Officers Association) brought up concerns over residency requirements, pensions and the corruption in the city. These issues need to be addressed to make sure the control of the police department is in the best hands possible.
A crowd also gathered to testify on changes to the puppy mill act, which was passed by the voters by a narrow margin this past November. There are concerns that the law, as it is currently written, puts unnecessary limits on business owners, and so legislation has been filed to make sure we’re not turning honest breeders into criminals while still protecting the safety of animals in Missouri. (Winston was asked to be an expert witness, but the meeting was during naptime, so he did not testify.)
Click on the photo below to view a larger image.
My intern this year from Missouri State University, Keaton Ashlock, is an impressive photographer, and I wanted to feature some of his shots of the Capitol in my weekly column. Keaton took this one right after a big snow in Jefferson City.
Kraus: Mission Statement
I was inspired by a sermon in church a week or two ago. Our pastor spoke about making sure that our time is focused on what is important while eliminating time wasters. It occurred to me that it would be useful to come up with a mission statement for Senate District 8 – one that would help me and my staff focus on what is important to Eastern Jackson County. Below is what we’ve come up with. The mission statement and our objectives will be posted on Senate website at www.senate.mo.gov/kraus.
Taxpayers do not want their dollars to be used to buy drugs. This bill, if passed, would lead to our dollars being spent more wisely.
If drug use is confirmed, the recipient would be removed from their benefits for one year and be referred to a drug treatment program. Any children in the home would continue to receive benefits, but through a third-party payee designated by the department. Several versions of the bill have been introduced, and I’m working with other sponsors to agree on the best language. Expect SB 74 to be back in front of the committee in a few weeks. A passing vote out of committee would send my measure to the full Senate for debate.
District 8 Mission Statement
State Sen. Will Kraus will focus on representing the constituents in Eastern Jackson County by making them a priority and focusing his and the office staff’s time on what is important to the district. We will serve the people to the best of our abilities. In order to achieve this mission, the office will identify three main objectives each year. For 2011, they are:- Focus on the People
Provide excellent constituent service by representing the values of District 8, listening to the people, responding to phone calls, letters, e-mails, attending in-district meetings and events, as well as serving as your voice in Jefferson City.
- Fiscal Responsibility
Be mindful that the money we are appropriating is the taxpayers’ money. We need to watch spending to ensure we are allocating funds wisely and not wastefully.
- Economic Climate and Jobs
Foster an economic climate that grows jobs by making it a priority to work on legislation that benefits Missouri’s economy. Putting people back to work is the best way to help the people of Eastern Jackson County. It is also the best way to help our budget woes by ensuring that working people who pay taxes on their income and contribute to the economy are able to purchase goods and services.
Testing for Drug Use
This session, I am sponsoring SB 74, which requires the Department of Social Services to screen applicants or recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits for signs of drug use, and to test for the use of drugs if reasonable cause is found by the department. This week, the Senate Health, Mental Health, Seniors and Families Committee held a hearing on the bill.Taxpayers do not want their dollars to be used to buy drugs. This bill, if passed, would lead to our dollars being spent more wisely.
If drug use is confirmed, the recipient would be removed from their benefits for one year and be referred to a drug treatment program. Any children in the home would continue to receive benefits, but through a third-party payee designated by the department. Several versions of the bill have been introduced, and I’m working with other sponsors to agree on the best language. Expect SB 74 to be back in front of the committee in a few weeks. A passing vote out of committee would send my measure to the full Senate for debate.
Upcoming Elections
The following elections are scheduled in Eastern Jackson County. I encourage you to remember the dates for your area and get out and vote!| Date | Election |
| Feb. 8 | Lee’s Summit Reorganized School Dist. No. 7 (89¢ increase in tax levy) |
| Feb. 8 | Grain Valley R-V School District (Borrow $3 million for site development) |
| Feb. 22 | Kansas City Mayor/City Council Primary Election |
| Mar. 22 | Kansas City Mayor/City Council General Election |
| Apr. 5 | Municipal Elections for the following: Kansas City (Earnings Tax Question) Blue Springs Grain Valley Greenwood Lake Lotawana Lake Tapawingo Levasy Lone Jack Oak Grove Sibley |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
