Rupp: From Bill to Law: Legislation Recently Taking Effect

Since the conclusion of the 2010 legislative session, 74 House bills and 32 Senate bills were sent to the governor.  Of those measures, 68 House bills and 30 Senate bills received the governor's signature.  Many of these measures took effect Aug. 28, exactly 90 days after the constitutional last day of session.  I touched on several of these bills in my end-of-session report, found on my Missouri Senate website.

Perhaps one of the most important measures passed last session was meaningful autism insurance reform that provides coverage to thousands of Missouri families. House Bill 1311, which I handled in the Senate, requires coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorders, including coverage for applied behavior analysis, for up to $40,000 annually, through the age of 18.  Even though the bill took effect Aug. 28, families can begin purchasing coverage on Jan. 1, 2011.

As a pro-life supporter in the General Assembly, I worked to help pass legislation that prohibits your tax dollars from funding abortions in Missouri through the federal health care bill.  Senate Bill 793 contains language that enacts new requirements for women seeking an abortion, such as having the opportunity to hear her baby's heartbeat and view an ultrasound.  The mother also will be told that the baby may feel pain during the procedure, be given an explanation of the financial responsibilities regarding the father of the child, and be informed of available counseling.

In order to help stop fraud, waste, and abuse in our state before it happens, my legislation, Senate Bill 757, was adopted into House Bill 1965, which also received the governor's signature.  The measure establishes a joint committee of House and Senate members to oversee the various grants and contracts awarded by federal stimulus funds.  The bill also requires the governor to submit a daily report of all amounts held from the state operating budget to the Missouri Accountability Portal, as well as out-of-state travel expenses for state employees or elected officials.

As a co-sponsor of the Health Care Freedom Act, which was included in House Bill 1764, voters were allowed to make their voice heard in this year's August primary elections and decided for themselves whether or not they want federal law to require them to purchase health insurance.  With an overwhelming 71 percent of the vote, Missourians made themselves loud and clear on this issue — citizens should be able to choose their own health care products and services.

To see a complete list of legislation delivered to the governor this year, visit the Missouri Senate website (www.senate.mo.gov), click on Session Information, and then on the Truly Agreed Bills link.

If you have any questions or comments about these measures or any other topic regarding state government, please visit my website, e-mail me, or call my office toll-free at (866) 271-2844.

Nance: Bills that are now law, In the District

August 28^th just passed and is the day that most bills take effect unless specifically dated or emergency clauses are attached. Many bills passed with great bi-partisan support.

Some of those bills include:

HB 1311
Establishes provisions regarding health insurance coverage for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and the licensure of behavior analysts and assistant behavior analysts.

HB 1408
Changes the time period before interest is paid on an overpayment of income tax from four months to 90 days after the last date to file a return, including an extension, or the date the return was filed.

HB 1472
Changes the laws regarding the designation of controlled substances (K-2).

HB 1695
Changes the laws regarding intoxication-related traffic offenses.

HB 1893
Changes the laws regarding the distribution of gaming funds for early childhood education and veterans' programs and requires an annual audit to be conducted on the fund accounts for three years.

Referendum

HB 1764
Prohibits persons, employers, or health care providers from being compelled to participate in any health care system and allows certain domestic insurance companies to dissolve under certain conditions. (Prop C)

HB 2
The Manufacturer's Job Act in an attempt to keep full employment of jobs in the automotive industry.

In the District

I was honored to receive the "Friend of Agriculture Award" from Farm Bureau on Monday evening. It is to recognize legislators serving in the Missouri House of Representatives who have been especially supportive of agriculture.

On Monday the 23^rd, I shared the Bill of Rights and Constitution with 19 scouts at the Methodist Church in Excelsior Springs.

I was the speaker at the Ray County Retired Teachers meeting today.

On Tuesday, September 7^th at 10:00 a.m., there will be a ribbon cutting for Route A Bridge in Hardin. At 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 7^th, there will be a ribbon cutting on N Hwy, south of Excelsior Springs.

Rupp: Missouri Voters Overwhelmingly Approve Health Care Freedom

Citizens Draw Line Between Federal and State Decisions

Nearly 940,000 Missourians throughout the state made their way to the polls on August 3 to make their voices heard.  Perhaps one of the most important measures to hit the ballot was the decision for health care freedom.

Proposition C, which passed by an overwhelming 71 percent by Missouri voters, amends Missouri Statutes to deny the federal government the authority to penalize our state's citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance and infringe upon the most basic rights we hold as Missourians, including the right to decide how we will take care of ourselves and our health care needs.  In the 2^nd District, Lincoln and St. Charles county voters followed the statewide trend by supporting the proposition with 76 percent of the vote.

It all started with the passage of the federal health care bill earlier this year, in which the "Affordable Care Act" was signed on March 23.  Proponents of the act said it would put into place comprehensive health insurance reforms that would hold insurance companies more accountable, lower health care costs, guarantee more health care choices, and enhance the quality of health care for all Americans.  In fact, since this measure was signed into law, citizens in states across our nation have been trying to let those in Washington, D.C. know that they don't want a federal law to force them to buy health insurance.

That's why I signed on, with 19 of my Senate colleagues, to co-sponsor a measure that would prohibit laws interfering with an individual's freedom of choice in health care.  The "Health Care Freedom Act" was included in House Bill 1764 and was approved by the General Assembly, placing the issue before voters in the August election.

Voters made sure to stand up for their rights, reinforcing their belief that Missourians should be able to choose their own health care products and services without living in fear of being fined or imprisoned for not participating in any government or privately run health care system.  This does not, however, reject any federal health care option nor take away an individual's choice to participate in the federal health care plan. Missourians drew a significant line regarding the role the federal government plays in determining very personal decisions — our health care.  I am proud to have worked to get this issue before the citizens of this state and will continue to serve the rights of those who elected me to serve as their voice in Jefferson City.

Plan H Opens Gate to Possible Flooding in 2^nd Senatorial District

I recently submitted a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill, U.S. Congressman Todd Akin, and Missouri Gov. Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon regarding Plan H and its possible impact on the citizens of Pike, Lincoln and St. Charles counties, two of which I represent in the Missouri Senate.  Below is the letter I wrote to Colonel Thomas O'Hara, District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:

I'm writing this letter in regards to Plan H, which is a proposal for levee alterations along the Upper Mississippi River in Missouri, Iowa, and Illinois.  This is a matter of urgent concern to me, especially in light of the fact that many people are not aware of this plan or its ramifications.

Plan H calls for building taller, wider and stronger levees along the Mississippi River all the way down through Iowa, Northern Missouri and Illinois, until it gets to Pike, Lincoln and St. Charles counties in Missouri.  In these three counties, the plan does not include building flood-proof levees.  Instead, it calls for about half of the counties' levees to be improved while the other half is required to be left as is.  The lands behind the unprotected levees have been designated as "flood water storage areas."  Mississippi River bottom lands north of these counties would receive federal protection from flooding, with the three counties of Pike, Lincoln and St. Charles, two of which I represent in the Missouri Senate, left unprotected against the threat of floods.  This is totally unacceptable.

I am asking that you oppose this plan, as it will make the counties of Pike, Lincoln and St. Charles the dumping ground for future floods.  This would be devastating to my constituents in the 2^nd Senatorial District.  I have written Gov. Nixon, both U.S. Sens. Christopher Bond and Claire McCaskill, and Congressman Todd Akin stating my opposition to Plan H and asked for their support in opposing the plan as well.  I believe that further studies need to be done in order to truly understand the effects of building these better levees, new hydrology and flow studies on the more recent floods since 1993 need to be done, and public hearings need to be held in the areas that will be affected, namely the three counties that will be left unprotected.

If you have any questions or comments about this week's column or any other matter involving state government, please do not hesitate to contact me.  You can reach my office by phone at (866) 271-2844.

Stouffer: Make Your Voice Heard on Health Care

You will see a very important question on your August 3 ballot. Proposition C came about as a result of work done by the Missouri General Assembly during this year's regular session.

The Health Care Freedom Act was added to House Bill 1764. Predictably, some folks tried to keep this from appearing on the ballot, but their demands were thrown out by a judge.

Here is what you will see on your ballot:

Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

• Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services?
• Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.

Fair Ballot Language:  A "yes" vote will amend Missouri law to deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services. The amendment will also modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

A "no" vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding private health insurance, lawful healthcare services and the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

The bottom line is, you will decide whether or not Missouri should prohibit any law from forcing a patient, business owner or health care provider to take part in any health care system, be it government or privately run. At least 42 other states are working to enact similar legislation, but we are the first to let the voters make the decision. The entire country will be watching the Show-Me State to see what will happen.

Unfortunately, only around 24 percent of voters are expected to go to the polls on August 3, according to the Secretary of State's office. I understand that it is tough to get folks out to vote with so much going on this time of year, but it is vitally important to exercise our civic duty and right.

I believe the vote on Proposition C will do a lot to reinforce support for sovereignty and give a message nationwide that states are tired of being told what to do by bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. This is our opportunity to take control and reaffirm our rights as Americans.

Joe Smith: August Primary: What Your "Yes" Vote Means on Proposition C

During the course of the year, I received several phone calls, letters and emails from Missouri citizens expressing their outrage with the health care legislation that President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have pushed through Congress.  I want my constituents to know that I share that outrage.

Under the health care bill passed by the federal government, ALL citizens must have health insurance and the type of insurance they must carry is very detailed and specific.  If a citizen refuses to purchase the plan, he or she is penalized.  I stand in utter disagreement of the federal mandate.  We should be free to make our own health care decisions, not be forced by the federal government or anyone else.  Last session, the Missouri House passed the Health Care Freedom Act on the very first day we convened in the Chamber.  This Health Care Freedom Act preserves the rights for our citizens to keep their own health insurance plan, choose the federal plan or choose any other private plan – even if that choice is to have no plan at all.  No one will be mandated and no one will be penalized.

The Health Care Freedom Act doesn't simply depend on our approval; it must be approved by a vote of the people.  Next week, you will have an opportunity to join us in our fight as you go to the polls.  A "Yes" vote on Proposition C is a "Yes" vote for freedom.  The ballot language reads:

Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

1. Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services.
2. Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

For more information on the Health Care Freedom Act, please visit: http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills101/biltxt/truly/HB1764T.HTM

On August 3rd, Missouri will be the first state in the nation to have a vote on this issue, and everyone will be watching.  This will be an opportunity for us to stand up to Nancy Pelosi and President Obama and make it clear that we cherish our freedom and want to keep it.  It will also allow Missouri to serve as a role model for other states around the country who oppose the federal health care mandate.  If approved by Missouri citizens, it will become a statute and will be upheld, regardless of the federal mandate.  Please join me in voting "YES" on Proposition C this Tuesday, August 3rd.

Tim Jones: Proposition C and MSD

PROPOSITION C:  THE MISSOURI HEALTHCARE FREEDOM ACT

As you likely know, there is an election next Tuesday, August 3rd.  On that ballot you will find Proposition C, the Missouri Health Care Freedom Act which was passed in the last legislative session by a bipartisan, super majority vote of the House and Senate.  I was the original, lead sponsor of the Proposition in the House.

What do the different options on Proposition C mean for you?

I submit that a "Yes" vote on Proposition C preserves your present right to keep your own health insurance plan or choose any other private plan or no plan without being penalized for that choice.  A "Yes" vote is also your first opportunity as a citizen to express your opinion as to the federal healthcare bill that has come to be known as "ObamaCare". A "yes" vote on Prop.C (the Healthcare Freedom Act) is a message to Washington D.C. that you want the federal government to stay out of your healthcare options and choices.

A "No" vote on Proposition C would limit Missourians only to a government designed and approved plan.  A "No" vote on Prop. C sends a message to Washington D. C. that you agree with the federal government controlling your healthcare choices.

The actual ballot language reads:
Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

• "Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services.
• Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?"

The entire language of the two page bill may be found at the following link: http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills101/biltxt/truly/HB1764T.HTM.

If Proposition C passes on August 3rd, it will become a Missouri statute.

While our current healthcare system is not perfect, it is by far the best system in the world.  President Obama and a majority in Congress are seeking to impose their values and laws on our health system that has, up to this point, been run by state law and private enterprise.

One of the most important facts about ObamaCare is that Congress has EXEMPTED themselves from all the healthcare and insurance mandates that are imposed on the rest of the country.  If the new Federal Law is so good, then why did Congress exempt themselves?

Missourians will be the first citizens in the nation to vote on this issue.  The eyes of the Nation will be on the Show Me State next Tuesday, August 3^rd!

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding Proposition C, the Missouri Health Care Freedom Act and do not forget to vote next Tuesday!

Rep. Tim Jones' Storm Water Consumer Protections Law Enforced by Judge

JEFFERSON CITY – Legislation sponsored by Rep. Tim Jones (R-St. Louis County) meant to protect St. Louis area residents from storm water fees for services they are not receiving has been enforced by a Lincoln County judge. The legislation became law August 28, 2009.

HB 661 prohibits the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District from assessing a district property owner any fee for storm water management services if the property uses a septic system and does not receive any other services from the district.  Previously, the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District charged an "impervious surface runoff surcharge" to all property owners within the district's service boundaries regardless whether they received services from the district.

"I think it is a monumental victory for hard working taxpayers that the court has enforced this law and ruled that MSD can no longer collect fees for storm water services," Rep. Jones said.  "No longer will my constituents be paying for services they are not receiving."

"It was an honor and privilege to champion this legislative change for the folks in and around my district," said Rep. Jones.  "This is a great victory for the citizens affected by this fee."

MSD has not decided if they will file an appeal or find a funding replacement.

Nodler: Proposition C: Make Your Voice Heard

On August 3, voters throughout Missouri will be the first in the nation to have the opportunity to weigh in on the federal health care legislation passed by Congress. Thanks to legislation passed by the General Assembly during the 2010 legislative session, Missourians will be able to make their voices heard on whether they want the federal government to mandate their health care decisions.

Proposition C is on the August 3 primary ballot. Also called the Health Care Freedom Act [HB1764], the ballot measure originates from a bill passed earlier this year. I co-sponsored the original measure to protect the rights of citizens in this state. If voters approve Proposition C, it will result in a constitutional amendment providing that no federal law can compel a patient, employer, or health care provider in our state to participate in any government or privately run health care system, protecting the right of patients and employers to pay directly for legal health care services.

Since the federal government passed the health care legislation, I have spoken out about my opposition to the so-called “reform.” It is a costly venture that violates the individual rights of citizens. Heightening costs will also create a serious funding dilemma for states as they try to pay for an outrageous expansion in Medicaid costs. The law hurts businesses as they are forced to cover costs for their employees. When Congress passed this legislation, I heard from a number of Missourians who were concerned that their rights were being violated. With the Health Care Freedom Act, citizens have the opportunity to make their voices heard.

The passage of Proposition C would provide citizens with health care freedom — whether they chose to buy a private plan, use the federal plan, or purchase no plan at all. On August 3, you will be able to cast your vote and tell the federal government whether you think they should have the authority to penalize you for exercising your health care freedom.

Ridgeway: Proposition C - Missouri Health Care Freedom

Vote "Yes" to Opt-Out of ObamaCare
Vote "No" if you support ObamaCare

There is an election next Tuesday, August 3rd.  On that ballot you will find Proposition C, the Health Care Freedom Act which was passed in the last legislative session by a bipartisan, super majority vote of the House and Senate.  I voted FOR it in the Missouri Senate.

Proposition C provides Missourians a voice in the future of their own health care.

A "Yes" vote on Proposition C preserves your present right to keep your own health insurance plan or choose any other private plan or no plan without being penalized for that choice.  It also allows Missourians to select the federal government designed and approved insurance plan.  A "Yes" vote is your first opportunity as a citizen to express your opposition to the federal healthcare bill that has come to be known as "ObamaCare". By voting "yes" on Prop.C (the Healthcare Freedom Act), you will be sending a message to Washington D.C. that you want the federal government to stay out of your healthcare options.

A "No" vote on Proposition C would limit Missourians only to a government designed and approved plan.  A "No" vote on Prop. C sends a message to Washington D. C. that you are okay with the federal government controlling your healthcare choices.

The ballot language reads:
Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

• "Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services.
• Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?"

The entire language of the two page bill may be found at the following link: http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills101/biltxt/truly/HB1764T.HTM.

It simply states that government may not, "penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services." It does not require that the state opt out of any federal program or bar Missourians from participating in any plan of their choice including the federally designed plan.

If Proposition C passes on August 3rd, it will become a Missouri statute.

While our current healthcare system is not perfect, it is by far the best system in the world.  President Obama and a majority in Congress are seeking to impose their values and laws on our health system that has, up to this point, been run by state law and private enterprise.  I prefer the latter.

The most telling reason to support Proposition C (Missouri Healthcare Freedom Act) is that Congress has EXEMPTED themselves from all the healthcare and insurance mandates that they seek to impose on us.  So the Washington D.C. political ruling class sets up rules for us regular folk, but exempt themselves.  If it's so good, then why are they exempt?

Missourians will be the first Americans in the nation to have a vote on this issue.  It is a very important election.  Many people around the country will be watching for the Show-Me State election results.

If ObamaCare is not stopped, it will require enormous tax hikes to pay for it.  It is estimated that ObamaCare will require Missouri to add over 400,000 people to the welfare roles.  Cuts to education, veterans, public safety, our courts and the disabled will be the result -- again, unless the federal law is stopped.  A "yes" vote on Proposition C will go a long way to help us stop implementation of the federal ObamaCare law.

Feel free to call me if you have any questions, and I encourage you to forward this alert to your friends and family.  I will be voting "yes" on Proposition C, the Missouri Healthcare Freedom Act next Tuesday, August 3.

For a better Missouri,

Senator Luann Ridgeway

Goodman: Missourians to Vote on Health Care Freedom Act

On the Aug. 3 primary ballot, Missouri voters will have the opportunity to vote on the Missouri Health Care Freedom Act [HB1764]. During the regular legislative session, I, along with a solid majority of my colleagues, worked to get a bill passed that would put this issue before the voters so you could make your own decision regarding the issue, which is in response to the federal health care law passed earlier this year.

Proposition C will appear to Missouri voters on the ballot in the following language:

Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

• Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services?
• Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.

Fair Ballot Language: A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services. The amendment will also modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

A “no” vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding private health insurance, lawful healthcare services, and the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes.

Put simply, Missouri voters will choose whether or not the state should prohibit any law from forcing a patient, employer or health care provider to participate in any government or privately run health care system. Missouri will be the first state to hold a vote on this issue, leading the way for the 42 other states that are working to enact similar legislation. The outcome of the vote will surely be closely watched and analyzed around the country, as Missourians will give more insight into public opinion on the federal government’s new health care plan.

Throughout the legislative process, I worked to get this very important issue before the voters, because I firmly believe that Missourians need an opportunity for their voices to be heard. Health care is a deeply personal matter, and by putting it to a vote, we can ensure that Missouri residents have a say in what they believe are the appropriate health insurance options for themselves and their families. I encourage you to educate yourself on the issue and head to the voting booth on Aug. 3.

As always, I welcome your ideas, questions and concerns about Missouri government. You may contact me at the State Capitol as follows: (573) 751-2234, jack{dot}goodman{at}senate{dot}mo{dot}gov or by writing to Senator Jack Goodman, Missouri State Capitol, Room 331-A, Jefferson City, MO 65101.

Gatschenberger: Health Care Ballot Language, St. Charles County First Choice for New Missourians, Governor's Withholdings

August 3, 2010 Ballot Measure

The following ballot measure has been certified for the August 3, 2010 election. I want you to have an advanced copy of the Fair Ballot Language so that you can be sure how you want to vote. This language was taken directly from the Secretary of States Website…

Official Ballot Title: Proposition C

Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

• Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services?
• Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.

Fair Ballot Language:

A “yes” vote will amend Missouri law to deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services. The amendment will also modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

A “no” vote will not change the current Missouri law regarding private health insurance, lawful healthcare services, and the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies.

If passed, this measure will have no (immediate direct) impact on taxes. (But projections say it will cost our state at least $490,000,000 the first year it is enacted). (My comments are in brackets here).

[Full text] [Proposed by the 95th General Assembly (Second Regular Session) SS SCS HCS HB 1764

Missouri GOP leaders endorse Proposition C, aimed at blocking federal health care changes

By Jo Mannies, Beacon Political Reporter
[Link to original article]

The Missouri Republican State Committee announced that it had "unanimously approved a resolution to support the Health Care Freedom Act and urge the adoption of Proposition C on the August ballot."

Myself and several prominent area Republicans -- including state Senators Jane Cunningham, R-Chesterfield, and Jim Lembke, R-Lemay -- are key figures behind the Health Care Freedom Act, (Proposition C) which is aimed at allowing Missouri to reject parts of the federal health care changes that Congress and President Barack Obama recently approved.

Proposition C provides that "no federal law shall compel a patient, employer, or health care provider to participate in any government or privately run health care system, nor prohibit a patient or employer from paying directly for legal health care services."

A suit has been filed to knock Proposition C off the Aug. 3 ballot.

"Missouri’s Republican elected officials have been working hard to protect our state from the worst parts of the Democrats’ overbearing health care bill," said David Cole, chairman of the Missouri Republican Party, in a statement after Saturday's meeting, held in Jefferson City.

"The Republican Party believes that Missourians should be able to make their own health insurance decisions—not have them made by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama in the smoke-filled rooms of Washington, DC. Now, Missourians will be able to make their voices heard—and we strongly encourage them to send national Democrats a message."

He noted that that 25 Democrats in the House and Senate sided with 109 Republicans to approve putting Proposition C on the ballot. Support of a majority of voters would be needed.

The vote would be the first in the country pertaining to the federal health care charges. Several other states have approved the Freedom Act, which was signed into law by their governors.

Several states also have sued the federal government over parts of the new health care law. Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder, a Republican, has assembled a legal team and says he expects to fill suit shortly.

St. Charles County is No. 1 choice for new residents in Missouri

More new residents moved into St. Charles County last year than anywhere else in Missouri, according to annual estimates released by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center.

From July 1, 2008 to July 1, 2009, St. Charles County welcomed 5,772 new residents, the most of any Missouri County. The next largest in‐flux of new residents during the same period was experienced by Jackson County (+5,009) and Clay County (+4,988).

“There is an endless list of amenities and benefits that make living and working in St. Charles County extremely attractive to current and new residents and businesses,” said Greg Prestemon, president and chief executive officer of the Economic Development Center of St. Charles County. “From the national rankings our communities are regularly receiving, to the area’s competitive costs and dynamic business clusters, St. Charles County is the location of choice in Missouri.”

For more state-wide data, visit: http://www.missourieconomy.org/indicators/population/countypop-2009.html

GOVERNOR’S ACTIONS

The Governor’s office has announced the actions he is taking for the upcoming fiscal year that begins July 1st, 2010. They have decided to only line-item veto one item which are the Admin Law Judges appointed by Gov. Blunt. As with the last time, I’m quite sure this will lead to another lawsuit.

As far as withholds go he did the following:

• An additional 250 state employees
• $10M from Missouri Consolidated Health Care-these changes will lead to additional copays and premiums
• $70M from school transportation categorical-this will have a substantial impact on school bus travel
• $54M from Access MO and Bright Flight1
• MORENet is eliminated
• KCATA withheld in its entirety
• Local transit through MODOT will incur a $3M withhold
• Biodiesel $1.5M
• 15% withhold to AAA’s and Core Public Health
• 10% withhold to Alternatives to Abortion
• 15% withhold to the following – MO Mentoring, MARCH, Home visitation, voluntary placement, domestic violence
• 10% withhold to FQHC’s
• Provider Rates in DHSS/DMH cut 2%
• Judiciary $5M withhold

These are the high level withholdings. A specific list is available on the Governor’s website at www.governor.mo.gov Keep in mind that these are withholds and not veto’s which means two things, 1) if revenue in the state picks up the Governor can release money for these programs but, 2) the legislature does not have the ability to override any of these decisions.

The total will be approx $300M, not the $350 he has been talking because as they now admit the budget the legislature passed is a lot more balanced then they have led on. The fact that these are withholds and not straight veto’s further proves this point.

GOD Is Busy

If you don't know GOD, don't make stupid remarks!!!!!!

A United States Marine was attending some college
Courses between assignments. He had completed missions
In Iraq and Afghanistan . One of the courses had a professor
Who was an avowed atheist, and a member of the ACLU.

One day the professor shocked the class when he came in.
He looked to the ceiling and flatly stated, GOD if you are real
Then I want you to knock me off this platform.. I'll give you exactly
15 min.' The lecture room fell silent. You could hear a pin drop.
Ten minutes went by and the professor proclaimed, 'Here I am
GOD, I'm still waiting.'

It got down to the last couple of minutes when the Marine got
Out of his chair, went up to the professor, and cold-cocked him;
Knocking him off the platform.. The professor was out cold.
The Marine went back to his seat and sat there, silently.

The other students were shocked and stunned, and sat there
Looking on in silence. The professor eventually came to,
Noticeably shaken, looked at the Marine and asked, 'What
In the world is the matter with you? 'Why did you do that?'
The Marine calmly replied, 'GOD was too busy today protecting
American soldiers who are protecting your right to say stupid
Stuff and act like an idiot. So He sent me.'

The classroom erupted in cheers!

MY VOTING RECORD – A LETTER FROM NFIB

STAY IN TOUCH

As always, please let me know your thoughts about these or other matters of concern by calling my office at: (573) 751-3572 or by emailing me at chuck{dot}gatschenberger{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov

FUN FACTS

Never wrestle with a pig... you both get dirty and the pig likes it.

Yehaw! The Blackberries are ripe… the blackberries are ripe… and you know what that means… CHIGGER BITES! Oh… but blackberry cobbler is soooo gooood!!

Three-toed box turtles mostly lay their eggs from mid May to early July and some will hatch in about three months, but eggs laid late in the summer will not hatch until the following spring. Talk about your long term storage facility… Female box turtles have the ability produce fertilized eggs up to four years after mating.

Gatschenberger: An invitation to 3.5 Million of Your Unclaimed Property and the next Town Hall Meeting

Help me return $3.5 MILLION to you!

A computer search indicates our State Treasurer is currently holding more than $3.5 MILLION, belonging to approximately 38,270 citizens who live in my district.  To file a claim, or check to see if they have your Unclaimed Property, you may visit www.ShowMeMoney.com or write to the State Treasurer at P.O. Box 1004, Jefferson City, MO  65102-1004.  This property, and another $70 to $80 million a year, is turned over to the State Treasurer from banks, government agencies and insurance companies from accounts that have been inactive an whose owner could not be contacted for five or more years.

Please be my guest!

What:  Town Hall Meeting
When:  Thursday, June 24^th – 7:00 pm
Where:  Wentzville City Hall – 310 W Pearce Blvd
Why:  Information on what the University of Missouri Extension Office can do for you as an individual… or as a small business.  Scott Killpack from the University of Missouri Extension Office in St. Charles County will explain what is available and how you can take advantage of their services.  For example… did you know they can help you with your yard problems?  Your health & nutrition questions?  Your small business ideas?  Your needs as a dislocated worker?  Your family financial maze?

Also, James Gremaud from the Missouri Department of Transportation will be on hand to give you an update of MoDot projects in the 13^th District and get your thoughts on Truck Lanes.

You won't want to miss this very important information session… so please mark your calendars now!

More than 70 people attended my last Town Hall Meeting in Wentzville

For questions on the content of this meeting you may contact my Capitol office at (573) 751-3572 or e-mail me at Chuck{dot}Gatschenberger{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov

Please note:  My Capitol Office will be closed starting Friday, July 2^nd until Tuesday July 7^th… for staff vacation.

Job Creation Information

GM plant in Wentzville to build vans powered by alternative fuel

Production line answers demand, official says

By Joe Scott
Tuesday, May 25, 2010 3:11 AM CDT
[Link to Original Story]

General Motors' Wentzville assembly plant will begin producing compressed natural gas- and liquefied petroleum gas-powered cargo vans for 2011. The alternative fuel options will be offered on Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana full-size vans for fleet and commercial customers later this year.

"It won't have an impact on hiring or additional jobs, but it will allow us to get penetration into an additional market," said Bob Wheeler, a spokesman for the plant. "The demand is increasing enough to add this product to our portfolio. We've had fleet and commercial users asking about this."  Production of CNG- and LPG-powered versions of the Chevrolet Express and GMC Savana full-size vans probably will begin in September, Wheeler said. About 85 percent of the vehicles made at the Wentzville plant are sold for fleet or commercial use. Alternative fuels have become more attractive for fleet and commercial users as gasoline prices increase, Wheeler said.

Wentzville Community Development Director Bob Swank said even if the plant doesn't add jobs, a new product line should further stabilize the workforce. "It's bringing back this product to the Wentzville area," Swank said. "The more environmentally conscious people get and the less we want to rely on oil, the more the LPG and CNG market grows."

Brian Small, general manager of GM's fleet and commercial operations, said in a news release that GM officials listened to fleet customers and dealers about offering options to help achieve business objectives.  "The industry commitment to expand the CNG and LPG infrastructure in key fleet markets was an enabler to allowing us to introduce these options now," Small said.

Swank said the city of Wentzville will offer a CNG fueling station on East Pearce Boulevard at Business Highway 61 near Pete's Drive-In for public use. The fueling station was put on hold after GM discontinued production of CNG-powered vehicles at the Wentzville plant several years ago, he said. "It will be one of three CNG fueling stations in Missouri," Swank said. "Fleet and commercial users can pull right off Highway 61 and refuel."

GM's announcement on the new Wentzville plant production line followed news the car manufacturer had a first-quarter profit of $865 million and is expanding manufacturing in North America. Before its bankruptcy, GM lost $6 billion in the first quarter of 2009.

MasterCard plans new research labs in O'Fallon

By Joe Scott
Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:10 AM CDT
[Link to Original Story]

MasterCard Worldwide's O'Fallon location will be one of four sites to host a new research and development initiative.

The credit card company will invest "tens of millions per year" on people and resources through the company's new research arm, called MasterCard Labs, according to Bank Systems and Technology, a banking industry publication.

The O'Fallon site serves as the company's Global Technology and Operations headquarters. Other sites to receive the labs are in Singapore, Dublin and Purchase, N.Y., the company's global headquarters.

"With the launch of MasterCard Labs, MasterCard will create a robust global virtual team to execute our vision for the future of payments," Rob Reeg, president of Global Technology and Operations for MasterCard Worldwide, said in a statement released to the Journal Thursday.

"The team will include creative development engineers and programmers who know how to turn an idea into something that can be quickly and effectively brought to market and scaled to meet the diverse needs of cardholders around the globe," Reeg said.

Reeg said MasterCard will build the new team using a mix of internal resources, vendors and new hires. He said he couldn't provide specifics on timing or number of new hires in the St. Louis area, but the new positions would be posted online as needed. The company also announced Garry Lyons would oversee MasterCard Labs.

House and Senate Accomplishments, 2010 Legislative Session

Budget: Protecting Missourians, No New Taxes

Together with the Senate, we shaved a total of $484 million from the Governor's proposed budget, making the tough decisions necessary to keep Missouri afloat in our harsh economy.

While neighboring states are sinking further into economic crisis, raising taxes and having a difficult time paying their bills, Missouri has remained steadfast in our fiscally conservative practice.

Not only were we able to pass a balanced budget, we made the tough decisions necessary to avoid raising taxes on Missouri families.  Thirteen budget bills totaling $23.1 billion for the fiscal year beginning July 1 were agreed upon by both chambers and will be sent to the Governor for final approval.

I am pleased to report that we voted to maintain the school funding formula at its current levels. In addition, Missouri's K-12 schools will receive the same level of funding in the 2011 Fiscal Year as they did this year.

The largest savings, anticipated to be millions, came from looking at state departments and identifying how they may run more efficiently by eliminating more than 1,000 government jobs, including taxpayer-funded lobbyists and items like equipment, travel and expenses.

I am extremely proud that we completed the budget more than one week in advance of the deadline set by the state constitution.

Because we continued down a fiscally-conservative path while balancing our state's budget, we are able to keep Missouri in a leadership position when it comes to being financially stable.

Protecting the Lives of the Unborn

Both Chambers passed SB793, seeking to protect the lives of the unborn.  This act modifies the informed consent requirements for an abortion by adding new requirements to be obtained at least twenty-four hours prior to an abortion by adding the following provisions:

• The physician who is to perform or induce the abortion or a qualified professional must present the pregnant woman with various new printed materials (to be developed by the Department of Health and Senior Services by November 30, 2010) detailing the risks of an abortion and the physiological characteristics of an unborn child at two-week gestational increments;
• The woman must also be provided with the gestational age of the unborn child at the time the abortion is to be performed and must be given an opportunity to view an active ultrasound of the unborn child and hear the heartbeat of the unborn child;
• Prior to an abortion being performed past twenty-two weeks gestational age, the woman must be provided information regarding the possibility of the abortion causing pain to the unborn child.
• The abortion cannot be performed until the woman certifies in writing on a checklist form that she has been presented all the required information and that she has been given the opportunity to view an ultrasound, and to choose to have an anesthetic or analgesic administered to the unborn child.

Health Care Freedom Act: Opting Out of the Federal Plan

Missouri citizens are outraged with the health care legislation that President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have pushed through Congress.  I want my constituents to know that in the General Assembly, we share your outrage and we passed a bill that seeks to protect you and your family from these harmful federal mandates.

When the United States House of Representatives passed their health care bill, yielding over two thousand pages, they immediately took away our basic rights.  Congress and the President have ignored the cry of the American people and they pushed their own agenda – leaving our citizens to pick up the expensive tab.

There is a fine line when it comes to government mandates, and Congress and the President have crossed that line.  Even though no Republicans in the House voted for the bill, the Democrat majority found the votes they needed for it to pass.

The federal health care bill costs approximately $940 billion, which is concerning as we face such a serious economic depression, not to mention our national debt which has shot up into the trillions.  Someone has to pick up the tab, and that someone is you and me.  We will be taxed through penalties if we refuse to buy health care and adhere to federal guidelines.

I have no direct influence over the actions of our President and Congress, but I do have a say when it comes to what we do in the Missouri House of Representatives to protect citizens from federal health care mandates.  Why should the government dictate what you must and must not do – especially when it comes to your own health care insurance?

On the first day of this year's session, we introduced the Health Care Freedom Act on the floor of the House and approved it for final passage in early March.  Now that's it has passed the Senate, it [HB1764] will go to the ballot in August for a vote of YOU, the people.

The Health Care Freedom Act would give individuals and employers the opportunity to pay directly for lawful health care services without being subject to federal penalties and states that the purchase or sale of health care insurance in private health care systems cannot be prohibited by law or rule.

A majority of states in the country have filed legislation to oppose the federal health care legislation, and we are hopeful that you will join us in this fight.  States should retain the power to regulate health care and allow their citizens the freedom to choose between health care options in the open market.

To the Federal Government: Balance the National Budget!

You are a hard-working Missouri taxpayer.  You have bills, expenses and every day items that run up costs.  You know what it means to sit down and balance your budget so you can keep your family on track. In state government, we do the same thing.  Every year, we go through the budget line by line and make the tough decisions necessary to balance our budget.  It's not easy, but it's the right thing to do.

Our federal government is a completely different story.  It's almost as if a balanced budget is a foreign concept to them.  This year, the national budget was out of balance by over 40%.

We are in the midst of what economists are calling "The Great Recession" and spending our way to prosperity isn't the answer – but wise fiscal planning and responsible use of your tax dollars is the answer.

Both chambers passed House Concurrent Resolution 34 and 35 sponsored by our Budget Chairman, Allen Icet and Representative Chris Kelly, asking Congress to balance the national budget.

The HCR 34 & 35 comes as an official message from the Missouri General Assembly, and if adopted by Congress, it has a chance of becoming an amendment to the United States Constitution.  An official change will depend on ratification by ¾'s of our nation's states.

With a budget that is over 40% out of balance, and a recent vote to raise the debt ceiling by 1.9 trillion dollars, we need to bring our elected officials in Washington DC back to reality.

Congress needs to stop spending and start standing up for the future of America.  You, as constituents, can help.  If you agree with our resolution to require the national government to balance the budget, contact your U.S. Senators and Representatives and let them know you support us in this effort.

STAY IN TOUCH

As always, please let me know your thoughts about these or other matters of concern by calling my office at: (573) 751-3572 or by emailing me at chuck{dot}gatschenberger{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov

FUN FACTS

You made it over the hump!  June 21^st… the first day of Summer Solstice:  the longest day of the year!

If you can stay awake that long… cast your eyes heavenward… there will be a Partial Lunar Eclipse on the 26^th!

It's getting noisier out there… with cricket frog breeding at its peak and dog-day cicadas singing away… joining the fireworks melee for Independence Day!

Cunningham: KMOX Interview on Health Care Freedom Act

Dear Friends - The interview with Mark Reardon on KMOX today will give you a verbal update on the progress and challenges ahead for the Health Care Freedom Act. You can hear and see the interview at http://www.kmox.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=4736960. If you want you can go to KMOX’s home page and access the interview under Mark Reardon’s banner two thirds of the way down on the right side of the home page - http://www.kmox.com/.

Our statute, HB1764, that passed the legislature is headed to a vote of the people to be ratified, if you will, on August 3rd. This was a very rare move to send a statute to a vote of the people but I have learned that Missourians are angry about not having their voices heard in Washington, D.C. and this would give them/you an official opportunity to express their/your wishes. Additionally, we did an end run around the Governor because we expected him to veto the bill.

The election of the Health Care Freedom Act on August 3 will be the first referendum in the nation on Obamacare and so a lot of eyes around the country will be on Missouri. It will be Proposition C on your ballot.

Thank you for your interest in my work. The web site for the referendum is www.mohealthfreedom.org.

Gatschenberger: Missouri's Budget, End of Session Legislative Summary and Town Hall Invitation

Town Hall Report

As promised… the following is a summary of the budget information covered at our last Town Hall Meeting.   Although the material may be a bit technical, I believe it is worth your time to understand our State's Budget.  If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact my office.

I. FY 2011 MISSOURI STATE BUDGET SUMMARY (May, 2010)

State Fiscal Year 2011 (July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011)

Total Missouri State Operating Budget	$23,274, 922,486
State General Revenue	7,260,461,973
Federal Budget Stabilization (unrestricted)	572,388,526
Federal Budget Stabilization (education)	287,037,940
Federal Funds	7,035,061,286
Other Funds (Highway & Road Funds; Lottery & Gaming Proceeds; Conservation, Parks Soil & Water; Outstanding Schools Trust Fund, etc)	8,119,972,761

That $7.3 billion Net State General Revenue is derived from:

• $4.8 billion or 66.4% from Individual Income Tax
• $1.8 billion or 24.4% from Sales and Use Tax
• $0.4 billion or 4.9% from Corporate Income Tax
• $0.3 billion or 4.3% from Other Taxes

Largest Expenditures of Net State General Revenue:

• $2.8 billion or 38.9% for Elementary & Secondary Education
• $2.3 billion or 31.9% for Social Services, Health & Senior Services and Mental Health
• $0.9 billion or 12.5% for Higher Education

II. Missouri State Budget History

Normal/Average Net State General Revenue (GR) growth is + 3 to 4% more than the previous year's collections.  Over the last 10 years, it has been as low as (-) 3.2% in FY 2002 and as high as +9.2% in FY 2006

In FY 2009, last year, net tax collections dropped by what was at that time, was "the largest percentage drop" of minus (-) 6.9% below the previous year's revenues.  This drop resulted in actual net GR collections for FY 2009 of $7.4 billion, which is equal to the amount the state collected in FY 2006.

Missouri's Constitution requires that the Governor use line-item vetoes and/or withholding of funds from state agencies and programs when actual revenue collections drop below budgeted collections.  In FY 2009, the Governor withheld and reduced spending authorizations by $272.0 million.

The FY 2010 budget that we are currently getting ready to end on June 30 was built on estimated revenue growth of positive + 1.0%.  However, our national and state economies, driven by record unemployment of nearly 10%, have resulted in revisions that net GR collections could drop by more  than minus (–) 9.0%!  As a result of this shortfall, the Governor has vetoed or withheld more than $900.0 million of GR expenditures by state agencies and programs this year.

The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 has provided one-time Federal Budget Stabilization and targeted one-time Federal Stimulus Funds to the states.

Federal Budget Stabilization Funds (FBS) are provided over a 27-month period from Oct 2008 thru Dec 2010.  These one-time funds total approx'ly $2.4 billion that have been used to shore up the state budgets for (last year) FY 2009 and (this year) FY 2010.

Federal Stimulus Funds totaling another $2.6 billion are available for one-time "targeted and competitive" grants for state and local programs such as: job training, law enforcement, energy projects, unemployment benefits and broadband.

III. Special Circumstances for the FY 2010 Missouri State Budget

The original revenue estimate made 18 months previous for the FY 2011 budget was an optimistic + 3.6%.  However, as a result of the drastic reductions in state revenue in FY 2009 and 2010, the more recent revised estimate is a modest +2.2% growth on a much lower base of $6.7 billion of net GR in FY 2010.

On January 20 of this year, the Governor recommended a budget for FY 2011 that assumed the + 3.6% growth.  His spending proposals also included use of an additional $300.0 million of one-time "Extended" Federal Budget Stabilization Funds above and beyond the 27-month period of the 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act.   These additional one-time Extended Federal Budget Stabilization funds had been proposed in federal legislation, but have not yet been approved by Congress.

In March, the Governor asked the House and Senate Budget Committees to cut the budget he proposed for FY 2011 by $500.0 million.  The Governor's request to the General Assembly was to cut $200.0 million due to the FY 2011 revised general revenue estimate from + 3.6 to + 2.2% and his acknowledgement that the state may not receive the $300.0 million of Extended Federal Budget Stabilization Funds that he had included in his budget.  The House and the Senate worked together to make the very difficult and unpopular decisions to cut $484.0 million of GR from the FY 2011 budget that was proposed by the Governor in January.

In May, the Governor announced that he plans to cut $350.0 million more from the FY 2011 budget approved by the Legislature because some proposed budget-related legislation did not pass, the administration does not agree with some assumptions in the appropriations and monthly collections continue to fall below estimates.

IV. Challenges to the FY 2012 Missouri State Budget

The one-time Federal Budget Stabilization Funds totaling $860.0 million (see page 1 – the $572 million and $287 million) will be gone after the state FY 2011 budget.

Even if we get the Extended $300.0 million of FBS, we still have somewhere between $560 to $860 million MORE TO CUT from the base of the FY 2012 budget before we can even consider the increases that will be requested for the School Foundation Formula, Higher Education, Medicaid , Corrections, Public Safety, etc.

V. Highlights of the FY 2011 Missouri State Budget

• Flat funding for School Foundation Formula ($3.4 billion from all Funds)
• $15.0 million reduction to Foundation Transportation ($153.0 million)
• 5.2% or $50.0 million reduction in direct aid to Higher Education Institutions and Community Colleges ($911.0 million)
• $13.0 million cut in funds for Access Missouri need-based Scholarships ($83.0 million)
• $20.0 million reduction to state employee benefits
• $6.0 million reduction on Biodiesel subsidies ($13.4 million)
• $6.0 million reduction to Tourism ($13.9 million)
• $7.5 million additional for Corrections inmate health & mental health care ($136.6 million)
• $5.6 million additional for caseload growth in the Dept of Mental Health
• $16.5 million additional for Medicaid Home & Community Services in the Dept of Health & Senior Services
• $30.6 additional for Medicaid caseload growth in the Dept of Social Services

Please be my guest!

What:  Town Hall Meeting
When:  Thursday, June 24^th – 7:00 pm
Where:  Wentzville City Hall – 310 W Pearce Blvd
Why:  Information on what the University of Missouri Extension Office can do for you as an individual… or as a small business. Scott Killpack from the University of Missouri Extension Office in St. Charles County will explain what is available and how you can take advantage of their services.  For example… did you know they can help you with your yard problems?  Your health & nutrition questions?  Your small business ideas?  Your needs as a dislocated worker?  Your family financial maze?

Also, James Gremaud from the Missouri Department of Transportation will be on hand to give you an update of MoDot projects in the 13^th District and get your thoughts on Truck Lanes.

You won't want to miss this very important information session… so please mark your calendars now!

More than 70 people attended my last Town Hall Meeting in Wentzville

For questions on the content of this meeting you may contact my Capitol office at (573) 751-3572 or e-mail me at Chuck{dot}Gatschenberger{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov

Rupp: Session Ends on Successful Note

A flurry of activity was ended with the loud bang of the gavel, as the Senate session came to a close at 6 p.m. on Friday, May 14. For those of you keeping score at home, there were 491 Senate bills, 1,265 House Bills, and 83 Joint Resolutions filed this session, yet only a handful of these measures made it out of the Legislature, where they now sit on the governor’s desk and await his signature.

A portion of the legislation that made it to the executive branch were my efforts, while others contained language that I had worked on this session. My biggest priority was to protect taxpayers by balancing the budget without a tax increase. Reducing government spending was also accomplished and will continue to be priorities next session. We tackled the worst budget crisis in our state’s history head-on by advancing several “Rebooting Government” ideas to make government smaller and more efficient (click here to learn more about “Rebooting Government” initiatives.) You may always see my work at my website, but here’s a quick recap of my other priorities:

Autism Spectrum Disorder Insurance Reform – This year we finally were able to get this much-needed insurance reform out of the Legislature and ready for the many families whose lives will be impacted by this historic measure. Under House Bill 1311, insurance companies would no longer be able to deny or cancel coverage just because a child has autism. The proposed insurance coverage would include a physician or psychiatrist’s referral of Applied Behavior Analysis therapy — up to $40,000 per year for individuals — with a cost-of-living adjustment included. This measure makes Missouri the 20th state to cover the diagnosis and treatment of those on the autism spectrum.

Abortion – Language that I wrote that banned any health exchanges in Missouri — including the ones proposed in the federal health care legislation — from offering insurance coverage for abortion, was passed in a bill that also increased the requirements for abortion. These expanded requirements found in Senate Bill 793 include a chance for the mother to hear the child’s heartbeat, see an ultrasound, and view printed materials that detail the child’s development. It also includes mandatory referral to counseling and the Alternatives to Abortion program, and an explanation of the father’s responsibility for child support. Missouri continues to be a leader in protecting life, and I am blessed to be a part of this huge victory for life.

Health Care Freedom Act – This legislation, House Bill 1764, takes the issue to the voters and allows Missouri to be one of the first to sound off on the federal health care plan. If passed in August, no Missourian would be forced to participate in any government or privately run health care system, and it would ensure Missourians remain in charge of their own healthcare decisions without facing fines or penalties from the federal government.

For a complete listing of all Truly Agreed to and Finally Passed bills for the 2010 Session go to the Senate website at www.senate.mo.gov and click on “Session Information” on the right hand side for drop down menu. Then click on “Truly Agreed Bills” for the list.

All in all, I’d have to say that it was a very successful session, as my legislation continued to put Missouri at the forefront of the nation in conservative values. Thank you for your support this session, and I hope to see you in the community.

CENSUS FORMS

If you have not done so, please fill out and mail in your census forms. It is important that everyone is counted. There are two options if someone did not receive a census form or misplaced it.

1. Call the Kansas City regional office to complete a census form over the phone. The number is: ENGLISH - 1-866-872-6868
2. Call one of the regional centers to request to be placed on a list to receive a door to door visit from a census taker. The location and numbers of the regional centers are as follows:
   
   Odessa
   West US Highway 40
   Odessa, MO 64076
   Phone: 816-565-4054
   
   Cape Girardeau
   South Silver Springs Road
   Cape Girardeau, MO 65703
   Phone: 573-290-3220
   
   Columbia
   Business Loop 70 West
   Columbia, MO 64108
   Phone: 573-818-3330
   
   Kansas City
   Pershing Square
   Kansas City, MO 64108
   Phone: 816-977-2140
   
   Springfield
   OPENING SOON
   Springfield, MO 65806
   Phone: 1-866-861-2010
   
   St. Joseph
   Frederick Boulevard
   St. Joseph, MO 64506
   Phone: 816-385-5180
   
   St. Louis City
   Goodfellow Boulevard
   Saint Louis, MO 63120
   Phone: 314-802-9410
   
   St. Charles
   Bass Pro Drive
   St. Charles, MO 63303
   Phone: 636-866-2020
   
   Crestwood
   Watson Road
   Crestwood, MO 63126
   Phone: 314-800-0680

As always, if you have any questions about this week’s column or any other matter involving state government, please do not hesitate to contact me. You can reach my office by phone at (866) 271-2844.

Purgason: A Summary Of Legislation Passed

The work of your 95^th General Assembly second regular session has come to a close with the passage of 94 policy bills and 13 budget bills which now await the Governor's signature.  For the first time in many years lawmakers have succeeded in limiting the number of bills truly agreed and finally passed to less than 100 pieces of legislation.

Yes, some new laws and improvements to old laws are need from time to time, however, we do not need a law for everything or government to hold our hand in everything we do.

After putting forth a smaller budget without a tax increase, which dominated the majority of the legislative session, lawmakers pushed forward to truly agree and finally pass some important legislation.

In the last week of session the House and Senate agreed to send the "Health Care Freedom Act" [HB1764] to a vote of the people in upcoming August 2^nd primary election.  This August 2^nd ballot proposal will ask voters to decide whether to amend state statutes to deny the federal government's new found authority to penalize citizens and businesses for refusing to purchase health insurance.  Now, you can decide with your vote and send a meaningful message to Washington regarding the federal government's recent takeover of your healthcare.

Missouri is the first state in the union to put the new federal health insurance mandate before a vote of the people. At this time, similar measures are scheduled to appear on statewide ballots in Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma.

The Senate also agreed with the House to add the synthetic "marijuana like" drug found in K2 or "Spice" to the list of Schedule I controlled substances. As you may know, the use of K2 has become widespread among teens and young adults in recent months. This dangerous drug, which is sold over the counter in potpourri, is not safe and will soon be illegal to sell in Missouri. [HB1472]

Your lawmakers also agreed to strengthen Missouri's informed consent requirements for an abortion which will allow women to better understand the abortion procedure and be made aware of the resources available to help after the birth of her child. [SB793]

In addition, lawmakers also sent the "Mother Child Protection Act" to the Governor for his approval. This important measure will give a pregnant mother the right to defend her unborn child with the use of deadly force if necessary. As you know, violence against women and their unborn children is far from rare with thousands of pregnant women hurt each year by their spouse, boyfriends, ex-husbands or even other women. [HB2081]

And last, but not least, important revisions to our state's DWI laws were approved which requires state courts to handle any DWI case involving a defendant with two or more alcohol offenses as well as mandatory jail time for offenders who refuse to complete the requirements of a DWI court. [HB1695]

As your General Assembly adjourns each legislative session, I am always reminded of Mark Twain's humorous quote, which says, "The only time the people can rest is when the legislature is not in session".  Thankfully, your 95^th General Assembly has taken its job seriously and worked diligently to help move our state forward in the very difficult challenge of navigating our ship of state through the financial wreck of our national economy.

As always, I will listen to you and I appreciate any suggestions you may have that will help improve the lives of the people of this state. You are welcome to contact me at: 201 West Capitol Avenue, Room 420, Jefferson City, MO 65101, call me at 573-751-1882 or email at Chuck{dot}Purgason{at}senate{dot}mo{dot}gov.

Ruestman: Health Care: You Decide

The issue of states’ rights seems to be a continual battle. The national radical progressive agenda has put every state on notice as individual and state rights are quickly being diminished.

The strongest example of this is the national health care plan passed by the Democrat majority in Congress in February. It is appalling that the federal government wants to mandate you to purchase health insurance. This bill also infringes on your right to privacy as the federal government is now going to be aware of medical decisions you make and the cost of your insurance and treatment.

Beyond all that, this bill was originally estimated to cost approximately $940 billion. This is a staggering number when you take into account our national debt, which will soon be $13 TRILLION. Worse yet, the Congressional Budget Office recently announced their original estimates were short by $115 billion! This is a fine example of how inefficient government programs are. In April, Alan Greenspan was quoted as saying that the consequences were “severe” if the CBO estimates were wrong.

In the General Assembly we felt the issue was of such consequence that it should be decided by the voters. Congress seems to have ignored the cry of Americans in our state and nationwide to leave our health care alone forcing us to act on the state level. House Bill 1764, which is going to a vote of the people on the August 3^rd primary ballot, prohibits any person, employer or health care provider from being compelled to participate in a health care system.

In addition to the above clause, it protects your right to pay directly for lawful health care and providers can accept payment from any individual without being subject to fines or penalties. If passed, the purchase or sale of private health insurance could not be prohibited by any law.

This bill is essential to protecting the free enterprise in health care. We know the government doesn’t run any program well (remember Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae?). Why would we trust it with something so personal and important to our well-being?

On August 3^rd I encourage you to support this measure and protect our liberties in Missouri.

If you have problems, questions or wish to express concern over an issue, please do not hesitate to contact me or my Legislator Assistant, Jonathan, at my Capitol office either by phone 573-751-9801 or by e-mail at Marilyn{dot}Ruestman{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov.

Brandom: Important Legislation Interview and Census Information

The following text is from an end of session interview with the Sikeston Standard Democrat that highlights many important issues addressed this past legislative session. [abstract of original article]

By Scott Welton
scottw{at}standard-democrat{dot}com

SIKESTON — Like every legislative session, the Missouri General Assembly was able to accomplish some important objectives while others weren’t achieved before adjournment Friday.

“I think without question the budget was the most important legislation this session,” said State Rep. Ellen Brandom, 160th District. “Of course, it was
more important than ever this year.”

Brandom said crafting a budget was particularly difficult this year as money had to be cut from many program.

“That’s always tough to do,” she said. “It deserved a lot of time and attention.”

Brandom said while the budget preparation was a time consuming endeavor this session, it is likely to be even worse in 2011.

“The budget next year is going to overshadow everything,” she predicted.

Foremost among what many consider to be unfinished business during this session was a jobs creation bill. [HB1675]

“I think many of us were disappointed we didn’t pass any economic development legislation,” Brandom said.

Brandom said she was also hoping to see the mandatory drug testing for welfare applicants pass. [HB1377]

“I will go back with that next year,” she said.

One item that was passed but in a less-than-satisfactory form was an ethics reform bill.

“I thought the ethics bill was important,” said Brandom, who was on the House Ethics Committee. “I was disappointed that it was not the bill that the committee put forth. It was sidetracked by a legislative maneuver and, at the last minute, another ethics bill appeared. It was not nearly as comprehensive as the committee report was. We had we spent hours and hours on it.”

Brandom described the ethics bill which was approved, Senate Bill 844, as “a watered-down version, a much weaker bill than the ethics bill that came out of our committee. There were some improvements but not as much as many of us would have liked.”

She said legislators should not be allowed to offer consulting services while serving in office and regrets this restriction didn’t make it into the version that finally passed. “That was my No. 1 priority,” Brandom said.

There were some bright points, however, to the 2010 legislative session, according to Brandom.

“I think one of the good things that passed was changes to Access Missouri scholarships for needy students that are attending two year or four year
Missouri colleges and universities,” she said.

Currently, students at private schools are eligible for larger scholarships. Under the changes approved in Senate Bill 733, “its the same amount of money regardless of where you are going to school,” Brandom said.

Brandom said she was also pleased to see the bill addressing Autism issues, House Bill 1311, pass.

“Autism prior to this time was not covered by health insurance.”

Under this bill’s provisions, group insurance policies regulated by the state must cover the diagnosis and treatment of autistic children including up to $40,000 per year for behavioral therapy.

“Children with autism who receive help when their young can make great strides,” Brandom said.

Brandom described Senate Bill 793 as “pro-life legislation” as it requires additional information to be given to women 24 hours before an abortion including the option to view an ultrasound and listen to the heartbeat of the fetus.

“We don’t want women to be forced into an abortion if its not what they really want,” Brandom said.

Brandom said she was also happy to see House Bill 1764 pass. This bill gives the state’s voters a chance to pass a referendum in August which would exempt Missouri from being compelled by the federal health insurance mandate to have health insurance and from penalties for paying for their own health care.

The state should be able to regulate health care itself, she said, “and citizens should be free to make their own decisions about health care without any penalty.”

Some information for this story was provided by the Associated Press.

Urgent Call to Action

As many of you know we are in the middle of a census count. Unfortunately, the Missouri response rate has been extremely poor in rural areas. If this underperformance continues its present course, our state may lose a representative in the United States Congress and an electoral vote in the presidential election.

I would like to encourage all of you to return your census form and remind your neighbors to do the same.

If you did not receive a form or have misplaced it you can call the Kansas City regional office to request a replacement form at 1-866-872-6868.

This is a very important issue that will have a tremendous impact on the future of our state.

On a personal note, I wanted to thank everyone who visited my office during this past session. It is always a pleasure to have friends, neighbors, and constituents visit.


The Sikeston Jaycees were presented a resolution in the Missouri House of Representatives to honor their tireless dedication to the Sikeston community and support of charities. In the last ten years they have given over 1 million dollars to a number of local charities.

Pictured are Paul Myers the State Jaycee’s President, Ryan Merideth the 2010 Jaycee’s President, Matt Matthews the 2009 Rodeo Chairman, Barry Johnson, Sam Thomas, Bart Ziegenhorn, Brandon Kuehn, Zac Black, Patrick Douglas, Matt Drake, Jason Pounds, Marc Leible, Matt Bain, and Representative Ellen Brandom.

As always, please contact me if you have questions on this or any other issue. My toll-free number is 866-834-9219 or you can email me at Ellen{dot}Brandom{at}house{dot}mo{dot}gov

Nance: Monsignor Retires, Session Recap

Pictured above, Lawson resident Bob Lammers' brother, Monsignor Donald W. Lammers led the House in prayer for many years before retiring last week.

Below is a report by House Communications on the last week of session.

2010 Legislative Session Concludes

With the bang of the Speaker's gavel, the 2^nd Regular Session of the 95^th General Assembly came to a close at 6 p.m. Friday. Members of the Missouri House engaged in the traditional paper-toss, clearing their desks of documents accumulated during a session that resulted in the passage of 74 House bills and 32 Senate bills.

After the papers settled, legislative leaders met with the press to discuss some of the priority legislation approved by the House and Senate. Bills now on their way to the governor's desk to be signed into law address issues such as ethics reform, insurance coverage for autism, strengthened DWI penalties, new regulations for sexually oriented businesses and additional informed consents requirements for abortion.

Ethics Reform Package Receives Final Approval

On the final day of the legislative session, the Missouri House gave final approval to an ethics reform package designed to increase transparency and accountability in the political process. The House approved SB 844, handled in the House by Rep. Tim Jones, R-Eureka, by a vote of 153-5.

"This is one of the most aggressive ethics packages in this country and it will make a difference. It will make government more transparent. It will make campaign finance more transparent. It will make us more accountable. And it will make the citizens of our districts more proud of the work we do up here in a fine and transparent fashion," said Jones.

One provision of the bill would address the issue of political money laundering by restricting committee-to-committee transfers of campaign donations. SB 844 would limit the number of political committees and make it a crime to transfer committee funds with the intent to conceal the source of the original funds. Rep. Tim Flook, R-Liberty called the provision one of the most important in the bill.

"With this bill, we're eliminating as many as, I've heard by one estimate, almost 700 political committees that were used to transfer donations, that were used to launder money in some cases, hiding donations in other cases," Flook said. "Those committees going away is a major, major change in our state and I think that puts Missouri on the cutting edge of ideas for ethics reform. The public deserves to know who you receive support from."

The bill also gives the additional authority to the Missouri Ethics Commission to launch investigations. Under current law, the commission can act only after receiving a complaint. SB 844 would allow the commission to launch an investigation after a unanimous vote of all six commission members. The bill would also create the crime of obstructing an ethics investigation.

In addition, the bill would require that campaign contributions made during a legislative session in excess of $500 be reported within 48 hours. The bill would also make it a crime for an elected official to offer a job to a lawmaker in exchange for votes. SB 844 would also create new crimes for lobbyists who do not properly report how much they spend on meals and gifts for state officials.

While the legislation received strong bipartisan support, some members said the bill represents only the first step of many toward true ethics reform.

"I think that we have begun the conversation about ethics reform. I look forward to being back next year and in the interim to make sure we can improve upon this, but I think it would be a huge mistake to call it comprehensive," said Rep. Jason Kander, D-Kansas City. "On the other hand, I think that we have done something to improve the law. I am proud of that and I look forward to immediately after taking this vote, getting to work with everybody else on accomplishing true, comprehensive ethics reform."

The bill now moves to the governor's desk to be signed into law.

General Assembly Approves Bill to Enact Stiffer Penalties for Drunken Drivers

The Missouri General Assembly passed legislation Thursday that would create stronger penalties for DWI offenders. HB 1695, 1742 & 1674 is sponsored by Rep. Bryan Stevenson, R-Webb City, who said the bill contains a wide range of provisions dealing with drunken driving offenses.

"This bill overall is a good balance between increased treatment for first time offenders that find themselves in an unusual situation ….and increased stiffer penalties for individuals with a chronic drinking problem who have a real addiction issue," Stevenson said. "It's going to cost very little because we are going to divert some individuals out of the prison system, and the number of people not sitting in prison will be in treatment and on continuous alcohol monitoring," Rep. Stevenson said.

The bill would require drivers with blood-alcohol levels of at least 0.15 percent to spend 48 hours in jail, and those with at least 0.2 percent to spend at least five days in jail, unless they complete the requirements of a DWI court or docket. In addition, the bill would allow any circuit court to set up a DWI docket for repeat offenders or those whose blood-alcohol content exceeded 0.15 percent. Several Missouri courts already offer DWI Courts, which allow repeat DWI offenders to avoid jail time while receiving treatment for alcohol abuse.

The bill would also require state courts to handle any DWI case involving a defendant with at least two alcohol-related contacts with authorities, require police and prosecutors to adopt policies for reporting information on DWI offenses to a central databank, increase the minimum jail time for previous DWI offenders from five to 10 days and increase the minimum jail time for a persistent offender to 30 days.

Rep. John Burnett, D-Kansas City, was satisfied with the final version of the bill. "I think this will be the first DWI bill I've voted for since I've been here," Burnett said to Stevenson. "I think that you have struck a great balance with this bill. I've been a great critic of increasing penalties and thinking that penalties alone will deter drunk driving and make our highways safe. This bill does increase penalties, but it also focuses on the treatment aspects and I wanted to thank you publicly for that."

However, Rep. Jeff Roorda, D-Barnhart had mixed feelings about the legislation, which had several provisions removed when it was approved by the Senate.  "If mixed drinks were as watered down as this bill, we'd have a lot less drunks on the street," said Roorda, a former police officer. "This is a little bittersweet because we've fallen a little short of our wide-eyed imaginings, but let's cut to the positive. There is expansion to DWI courts. There are controls over these third time convictions of DWIs in the courts, so there is some good stuff in this bill."

The House approved the bill by a vote of 152-0. The bill now moves to the governor's desk to be signed into law.

General Assembly Approves Legislation to Provide Coverage to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

State-regulated group insurance policies would have to provide coverage for children with autism spectrum disorders under legislation approved by the Missouri General Assembly Wednesday. Rep. Dwight Scharnhorst, R-St. Louis, sponsors HB 1311 & 1341, which was passed through the House with a vote of 144-16 and through the Senate by a vote of 27-6

HB 1311 & 1341 would require group insurance policies to provide coverage for applied behavioral analysis services (ABA) for autistic children age 18 and younger. The coverage would have an annual cap of $40,000 and would be adjusted each year for inflation.

The bill went through several compromises in conferences with the Senate, including the age limit and caps on coverage, which were changed from the initial bills in both chambers.

"(The bill) is what I would consider a comprehensive bill that the legislature, the governor and all of us here in Missouri should be very proud that we have stepped forward to address this issue." Scharnhorst said.

Rep. Jason Grill, D-Kansas City, who sponsored HB 1341, expressed his appreciation on the passage of the bill. "This is a monumental day for Missourians. We are going to get a vote that we wanted on this bill," said Grill. "Many families that are listening right now, this is a big day for them. I have learned so much about this horrible illness, and hopefully in the future we can find ways to fix this through this therapy."

Some legislators worried an insurance mandate would place an undue burden on small businesses. Scharnhorst said he typically opposes mandates but felt the issue of autism merits a different approach. "I was a small business owner for many years…and it was never my intent to create a negative impact on employers.  If this mandate increased employers rates by more than 2.5 percent, it would allow them to opt out of the coverage," said Scharnhorst. Scharnhorst has previously cited studies showing an autism mandate would raise premiums by less than one percent.

The bill would also establish a state Behavior Analyst Advisory Board under the State Committee of Psychologists within the Division of Professional Registration. The new board would be charged with establishing and overseeing licensure and registration requirements for behavior analysts and assistant behavior analysts who provide therapies for children with autism spectrum disorders.

The provisions of HB 1311 & 1341 would apply primarily to Missourians receiving health insurance from small- and medium-sized employers. Missourians with individual insurance policies would not be mandated to obtain a policy with autism coverage, but would have the option to do so. Large employers who insure themselves fall under federal regulation.

The bill now awaits the governor's signature.

General Assembly Sends Bill Banning Sale of Synthetic Marijuana Drug "K2"

The General Assembly passed legislation Thursday that would add a type of synthetic marijuana to the state's list of controlled substances. Rep. Ward Franz, R-West Plains, sponsors HB 1472 to prohibit the substance, commonly known as K2, in the state of Missouri.

"I think it's important to get it off the shelves to protect our children," Franz said.

The synthetic cannabinoids contained in K2 are very closely related to tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the chemical in marijuana. However, because the chemicals in K2 are slightly different than THC, they are not covered by existing drug laws. Currently, Missourians of any age can buy K2 packaged as "potpourri" at many stores that sell tobacco products.

HB 1472 would add the synthetic cannabinoids used in K2 to the Schedule I list of controlled substances. Schedule I drugs include substances such as heroin and marijuana. Under the bill, possession of 35 grams or more of K2 would be a felony offense. Possession of lesser amounts would be a misdemeanor.

House members also considered adopting emergency clause on the bill, which would make the legislation into law immediately upon the governor's signature.

"This applies to getting this off the street quickly," Rep. Franz said. "We felt that we better not wait until the end of August to take a chance on how this could affect somebody's life."

Rep. Jake Zimmerman, D-Olivette, opposed the emergency clause. "I think it's a bad, bad idea to declare new crimes and put emergency clauses on them," Zimmerman said. "As much as I support the bill, I think it's appropriate that we give the law-abiding public of our state an opportunity to know what will be illegal in advance of it becoming illegal."

The House voted to defeat the emergency clause, but passed HB 1472 by a vote of 140-7. The legislation now goes to the governor's desk to be signed into law.

Missouri General Assembly Approves Legislation to Strengthen Informed Consent Requirements

The Missouri House gave final approval Friday to legislation that would strengthen the state's informed consent requirements to obtain an abortion. The House passed the SB 793, handled by Speaker Pro Tem Bryan Pratt, R-Blue Springs, by a vote of 114-39.

The bill would expand current law, which requires that a woman seeking an abortion be told of the physical and psychological risks of the procedure 24 hours prior to the abortion being performed. SB 793 would require that a woman seeking an abortion be given the opportunity to view an ultrasound image and listen to the heartbeat of the fetus. The bill would also require the consultation be done in person instead of over the phone. In addition, the legislation requires that women receive a description of the "anatomical and physiological characteristics of the unborn child. It would also require abortion providers to supply a brochure produced by the state that proclaims: "The life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being."

Pratt said the bill is meant to provide additional information to a woman seeking an abortion with the intent of persuading her to change her mind about undergoing the procedure. "With this bill, I think we can go in and make clear and make sure that if an abortion is done in the state of Missouri, that a woman will give proper informed consent," said Pratt. "If given all the medically accurate information, it's my belief that more women will choose not to have an abortion."

Rep. Beth Low, D-Kansas City, opposed the bill and challenged supporters of the legislation to propose a ban on abortion. "If the members of the pro-life majority were serious about ending abortion, we wouldn't see Senate Bill 793. We'd see a Senate Bill or a House Bill that actually outlawed abortion," said Low. "Instead we see cute little bills like this one every year aimed at the most vulnerable people in an incredibly vulnerable time."

SB 793 would also prohibit insurance coverage for abortions under policies offered through any health insurance exchanges, such as those located in the federal health care legislation. In addition, no health insurance exchange operating within Missouri would be allowed to offer coverage for elective abortions through the purchase of an optional rider.

The bill now moves to the governor's desk.

General Assembly Approves Legislation Regulating Sexually Oriented Businesses

The Missouri House gave final approval Thursday to legislation that would enact new regulations for sexually oriented businesses. The House passed SB 586 and 618, handled by Rep. Ed Emery, R-Lamar, by a vote of 118-28.

The bill would require sexually oriented businesses to be at least 1,000 feet from schools, churches, public parks and daycares, and place restrictions on nudity, hours of operation, alcohol sales and employees' proximity to patrons.

Emery spoke on the "negative secondary effects" of these businesses, which he said can include increased crime rates, decreased property values, a decrease in annual income of businesses in the sexually-oriented business vicinity, increased property insurance rates, negatively altered lifestyles of residents' living habits in the vicinity of a sexually-oriented business and the increase of communicable diseases.

"This sets in place serious, significant protections to try to minimize negative secondary effects on communities," Emery said. "We know that this is a widespread issue, and I believe that this bill will seriously control those, and benefit families in Missouri."

SBs 586 & 617 would bar nude activity and restrict semi-nude activity within sexually oriented businesses. It would also ban the use, sale or consumption of alcohol within such businesses. In addition, the legislation would prohibit adult establishments from operating between the hours of midnight and 6 a.m., and bar anyone younger than 18 from being on the premises at any time.

One provision of the bill says an employee can be charged with a misdemeanor for violating certain portions of the bill. Any business repeatedly in violation of the provision would constitute a public nuisance and would be subject to civil abatement proceedings.

Some representatives were not in favor of this portion of the bill.  "Whether or not we agree on this bill, it's just not right to hold employees responsible or liable for the behavior of their customers," Rep. Mike Colona, D-St. Louis, said. "If your boss doesn't properly train you, under this bill, you are going to be criminally liable, and that's just not fair."

Those in opposition to the bill felt that counties and municipalities should have local control over these businesses. Rep. John Burnett, D-Kansas City, inquired of Rep. Bryan Stevenson, R-Webb City, about the issue.  "I've heard you all say quite loudly that if you are not in favor of this bill, you're in favor of pornography, and it seems to me that the real issue here is that your county won't take local control over this issue. If we are going to impose rules…we should not paint this with such a broad brush.  Local control should be allowed. Local people should make local decisions."

The bill now moves to the governor's desk to be signed into law.

Missouri House Passes Bill Creating Statewide Vote on Health Care

The General Assembly passed HB 1764 Tuesday, a bill that would put the issue of federally-funded health care on the ballot for Missourians in August.

Rep. John Diehl, R-Town and Country, sponsors the bill, which originally dealt only with the dissolution of domestic health care insurance companies. However, provisions were added to prohibit persons, employers, or health care providers from being compelled to participate in any health care system. Originally, the health care provision was proposed as a constitutional amendment, but the Senate opted instead to present the issue as a state-wide referendum. This way, the legislation will bypass Gov. Nixon's desk and go straight to the voters to decide on August 3^rd.

Diehl said his constituents strongly oppose federal health care. "The residents of this state overwhelmingly reject what you and I have begun calling this Obamination of a bill, which is the federal health insurance bill," Diehl said in conversation with Rep. Tim Jones, R-Eureka, on the House floor. "It's just something I think is on everybody's mind, and they want the ability and the tools to be able to fight back on this."

Rep. Jones agreed, and hoped the referendum would allow citizens express their feelings about the federal legislation. "We're at the end of a long and arduous road, and this will give the people of Missouri the final say on this matter," Jones said. "The politicians here in this body are simply providing the vehicle."

Rep. John Burnett, D-Kansas City, objected to the fact that the health care issue would be paired with the dissolution of insurance companies on the ballot. "I don't question the Senators that have this sense of humor," Burnett said. "But, the joke is that they've taken a bill that is a very, very, very dense bill about the liquidation of domestic insurance companies, how we finalize business and insurance companies, and tied that to a political attack on our national health care system."

House Minority Leader Rep. Paul LeVota, D-Independence, opposed the bill. "This is a heck of a lot better than trying to change our constitution, because that would have been just a complete disaster," Rep. LeVota said. "This clearly is just simply an election year stunt."

The House approved HB 1764 by a vote of 108-47. The issue now goes to the voters for approval on August 3^rd.

House Sends Access Missouri Bill to Governor Nixon's Desk

State legislators finished work on SB 733 Wednesday, which would make significant changes to state-funded scholarships for higher education. The legislation would affect both the Access Missouri and Bright Flight scholarship programs.

Rep. Gayle Kingery, R-Poplar Bluff, handled the bill in the House. On the floor, he mentioned portions of the House's version of the bill that the Senate opted to leave out. One of these was the proposal to lower the GPA requirement for the Access Missouri scholarship from 2.5 to 2.0 for recipients' first two years of college.

"We didn't agree with that, but that was one of those things," Kingery said. "We took that part out to preserve the rest of the scholarship bill."

Rep. Joe Aull, D-Marshall, spoke in support of lowering the GPA. "I believe in high academic standards as much as anybody," Aull said. "But, I know that the Access scholarship is a need-based scholarship. A lot of freshman really struggle that first year in college, it's a culture shock adjustment for them, and they've got to get that grade point average up to 2.5. … Somebody could go in right now and have a 2.49, which is pretty darn close to 2.5, and they're going to lose their scholarship. This could be a low-income student, and that's that student's only chance to go to college."

The final bill addresses the discrepancy between scholarship money available to private and public school students through the Access Missouri program. Under current law, students who attend private and public schools are eligible for disparate award amounts. SB 733 would raise the maximum scholarship to $1,300 for community college students and set it at $2,850 for students at either public universities or private institutions, starting in 2014.

SB 733 would also modify the Bright Flight scholarship program. Most significantly, the bill would ensure that students who score in the top 3 percent with their ACT or SAT scores receive Bright Flight merit scholarship awards before those who score in the top fourth or fifth percent. Bright Flight eligibility will expand to the top 5 percent next year under a new state law.

In addition, the bill addresses students who elect to join the armed forces. These students who qualify for a Bright Flight scholarship may defer their award and receive it at a later date, as long as they return to full-time student status within six months of the end of their military service.

Rep. Sue Schoemehl, D-St. Louis, expressed her support for the legislation. "The changes in Bright Flight are very valuable," Rep. Schoemehl said. "So, I would ask the body to continue and to support the military exemptions we had in here."

The bill now goes to the governor to be signed into law.

Legislature Approves Bill to Downsize Government

The Missouri House gave final approval Friday to legislation that would reduce the size of state government and form a committee to study the potential for additional downsizing in the future. The House approved HB 1868, sponsored by Rep. Dwight Scharnhorst, R-St. Louis, by a vote of 124-29.

The bill would transfers the powers and duties of the State Water Patrol to the newly established Division of Water Patrol within the State Highway Patrol. Supporters of the change say it could save the state millions of dollars.

The bill would also establish the Joint Committee on the Reduction and Reorganization of Programs within State Government. The 14-member committee must publish a report by December 31, 2010, with recommendations for reducing, eliminating, or combining state programs and departments.

The bill now moves to the governor's desk to be signed into law.

Legislature Approves Bill to Ensure Prompt Tax Returns

The Missouri House gave final approval Thursday to legislation that would shorten the time the state has to issue tax refunds to Missouri taxpayers. Rep. Stanley Cox, R-Sedalia, sponsors HB 1408 & 1514, which would change the length of time the state can hold onto returns without paying interest from the current 120 days to 90 days.

Under the bill, the state would have 90 days from April 15 to process returns. For individuals who file late returns, the 90-day clock would start when the return is postmarked. Returns that fail to meet the 90-day deadline would be refunded with interest.

The House passed HB 1408 & 1514 by a vote of 147-0. It now moves to the governor's desk to be signed into law.